New Jersey Jury Awards $11 Million in Dental Malpractice Case March 9, 2009 Email This Subscribe to Newsletter Email to a friend Facebook Tweet LinkedIn Print Article Article 4 Comments March 10, 2009 at 7:05 am Pat says: Like or Dislike: 0 0If there is no negligence, how is there an award? Sounds like the condition was the proximate cause of loss. Reply March 10, 2009 at 8:03 am reaper says: Like or Dislike: 0 0I agree with you Pat. This is why we have a health care crisis. How did the jury arrive at 11 million when there is no negligence? Unreal! Reply March 10, 2009 at 8:21 am jersey mga says: Like or Dislike: 0 0the way i read this; the general dentist was found not negligent, and that blame was placed soley on the oral surgeon. Reply March 10, 2009 at 9:27 am chad says: Like or Dislike: 0 0There was a dentist and an oral surgeon as defendants in the case. The oral surgeon was found 100% liable and the dentist was found 0% liable. Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * Email * Comment ΔNotify me of comments via e-mail
If there is no negligence, how is there an award? Sounds like the condition was the proximate cause of loss.
I agree with you Pat. This is why we have a health care crisis. How did the jury arrive at 11 million when there is no negligence? Unreal!
the way i read this; the general dentist was found not negligent, and that blame was placed soley on the oral surgeon.
There was a dentist and an oral surgeon as defendants in the case. The oral surgeon was found 100% liable and the dentist was found 0% liable.