Planet, you should hide your head in shame. Enrolling 48% in Medicaid is not a badge of honor and should not be a measuring stick for success of Obamacare. The numbers have been skewed once again and the true believers like you think this is actually working. I wonder how many Millenials were enrolled in CT from October to now.
I get it, voting to repeal is tax wasting because the ACA has now been declared cost effective by CT’s enrollment numbers. Sign up the medicaid qualified, the over 40s, the uninsurable and heavily subsidized people and we all live happily ever after because the overall enrollment projection for CT will be met.
Perplexed, we don’t call him Planet from another Planet for nothing. He is also a Progressive troll and makes many posts that defy any understanding. One of my favorites is “Snap”, ding,ding, ding when he agrees with his running mate Libby or Metric Ron.
Since CT is a little over one percent of the US population and the overall goal was 7 million excl. Medicaid, wouldn’t the CT goal of 100k more likely have been excl. of Medicaid? Sounds like they set the goal with Medicaid excluded and now want to count the Medicaid sign-ups toward meeting the goal.
Must the CT variation of jobs saved and created being the same as jobs created.
All these people signing up has Sean Hannity weak in the knees. Time for another useless and tax-wasting vote to repeal?
Planet, you should hide your head in shame. Enrolling 48% in Medicaid is not a badge of honor and should not be a measuring stick for success of Obamacare. The numbers have been skewed once again and the true believers like you think this is actually working. I wonder how many Millenials were enrolled in CT from October to now.
I get it, voting to repeal is tax wasting because the ACA has now been declared cost effective by CT’s enrollment numbers. Sign up the medicaid qualified, the over 40s, the uninsurable and heavily subsidized people and we all live happily ever after because the overall enrollment projection for CT will be met.
Captain, you are a special kind of stupid. Didn’t you read the part about how many of those people enrolled are on the government teat?
Perplexed, we don’t call him Planet from another Planet for nothing. He is also a Progressive troll and makes many posts that defy any understanding. One of my favorites is “Snap”, ding,ding, ding when he agrees with his running mate Libby or Metric Ron.
Since CT is a little over one percent of the US population and the overall goal was 7 million excl. Medicaid, wouldn’t the CT goal of 100k more likely have been excl. of Medicaid? Sounds like they set the goal with Medicaid excluded and now want to count the Medicaid sign-ups toward meeting the goal.
Must the CT variation of jobs saved and created being the same as jobs created.