Senate Committee Holds Hearing on Flood Claims Process After Sandy

July 30, 2014

  • July 30, 2014 at 3:02 pm
    earlybird says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    from a retailers perspective, the NFIP service was terrible as a result of Sandy! just trying to reach the NFIP directly was almost impossible. The WYO carriers didn’t seem to understand their obligation to put adjusters’ “boots on the ground.” In the past, we had an NFIP liason work with our NC wind pool to create a “one adjuster” program which eliminated confusion and overlap. Didn’t happen in Sandy! So the service regressed. Fortunately, our insureds’ claims were a few hundred rather than the 2800 we had in Irene.

  • August 5, 2014 at 2:54 pm
    txcat says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Sounds good on paper to have 1 adjuster to adjust both flood and wind losses. However, the money to pay each of the claims comes from different sources. Flood, Fema money, and wind from the carrier. Unfortunately, as we learned during Katrina, a Conflict
    of interest when the adjuster may pass off damages to Flood loss
    vs the wind policy.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*