Interesting question, but answer would not have an effect on the presence or absence of coverage since neither of the two activities were work-related – both were personal activities, not associated with her occupational activities.
I have seen cases where the employee went to lunch in their own car, had an accident and then tried to claim it was during the work day. The cases got dismissed since it was not work related.
I wonder what story is correct. IJ says her mother was bringing her food. Claims Journal said mother was bringing her a wallet & feminine products.
Interesting question, but answer would not have an effect on the presence or absence of coverage since neither of the two activities were work-related – both were personal activities, not associated with her occupational activities.
I have seen cases where the employee went to lunch in their own car, had an accident and then tried to claim it was during the work day. The cases got dismissed since it was not work related.