Pennsylvania High Court Says Insurer Has Duty to Defend in Shooting Case

By | May 4, 2020

  • May 4, 2020 at 11:51 pm
    Boonedoggle says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    With the Court explicitly indicating there would be no duty to defend if the policies excluded discharge of a firearm, then the decision tree for casualty insurers is simple. Either exclude firearm liability or quit whining about firearm defense and indemnity.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *