Climate is not weather. El Nino is a normal weather event and causes no net warming of the earth because it just redistributes heat which is already in the system. There were countless articles about this when this El Nino was first announced when dozens of climate scientists explained it has nothing to do with climate change. This one is also not a “Monster” and is already starting to show signs of breaking up sooner then expected. What a shoddy example of poor journalistic research.
Clean, we have almost as many Climate Change articles on IJ as we do the success stories of Obamacare. It is built into their genes. They don’t have to publish these articles of trash, but they do it anyway and then both sides can argue about it for two weeks.
There isn’t any real arguing to do, that was done over the last 50 years in scientific journals. IJ, and others post facts based on science and reality, and then idiots, mostly you, come here and span dozens of messages about how it’s all fake, while citing nothing.
You’re right!! Those “climatologists” and “atmospheric scientists” with their fancy degrees don’t understand these things as well as you! You’re clearly the voice that should be credited.
All should read the Christopher Boggs article here on IJ entitled “Are You An Insurance ‘Expert'” and then apply his logic to scientists, and judge for yourself whether the science can reasonably be called “settled”.
True scientists are rarely certain, and constantly search for new data, new ideas, constantly challenge and question everything – even themselves.
Seems to me those who question the “settled” science are correct to do so, while those who proclaim the search is over are fools and lacking humility.
Yet another climate hysteria article.
Climate is not weather. El Nino is a normal weather event and causes no net warming of the earth because it just redistributes heat which is already in the system. There were countless articles about this when this El Nino was first announced when dozens of climate scientists explained it has nothing to do with climate change. This one is also not a “Monster” and is already starting to show signs of breaking up sooner then expected. What a shoddy example of poor journalistic research.
Clean, we have almost as many Climate Change articles on IJ as we do the success stories of Obamacare. It is built into their genes. They don’t have to publish these articles of trash, but they do it anyway and then both sides can argue about it for two weeks.
There isn’t any real arguing to do, that was done over the last 50 years in scientific journals. IJ, and others post facts based on science and reality, and then idiots, mostly you, come here and span dozens of messages about how it’s all fake, while citing nothing.
You’re right!! Those “climatologists” and “atmospheric scientists” with their fancy degrees don’t understand these things as well as you! You’re clearly the voice that should be credited.
Disagreeing with “Man-Made Climate Change” is now Hate Speach
Not at all. Just pathetically uninformed.
All should read the Christopher Boggs article here on IJ entitled “Are You An Insurance ‘Expert'” and then apply his logic to scientists, and judge for yourself whether the science can reasonably be called “settled”.
True scientists are rarely certain, and constantly search for new data, new ideas, constantly challenge and question everything – even themselves.
Seems to me those who question the “settled” science are correct to do so, while those who proclaim the search is over are fools and lacking humility.