Man made climate change is a scam, just a way to control people. This is well established and peer reviewed to be a scam. Climategate should have ended this nonsense.
Do you think Obama gave India a big climate change speech when he went over there? India & China are out of control on pollution. China has been thumbing their nose at us for a long time. They wouldn’t agree to start reigning in their emissions until 2030 while we agreed to reduce ours by 40% by 2020. What a deal our Negotiator in Chief made.
Ratings agencies should be very careful in attempting to utilize their power and influence to drive any particular social or political agenda. One needs only to read between the lines and understand the historical record of incrementalism to see what the future holds if this effort is allowed to take hold. The regulatory regime could easily be used to “encourage” certain behaviors by policy holders. Behaviors that may deviate significantly from what policy holders want to do, but behaviors that are desired by those driving an agenda. The net effect is a loss of individual freedom via corporate behavior driven by a compromised regulatory system. And the worst part is that the people at the end of the regulatory baton don’t get to vote for or against their behavioral masters.
Man made climate change is a scam, just a way to control people. This is well established and peer reviewed to be a scam. Climategate should have ended this nonsense.
Do you think Obama gave India a big climate change speech when he went over there? India & China are out of control on pollution. China has been thumbing their nose at us for a long time. They wouldn’t agree to start reigning in their emissions until 2030 while we agreed to reduce ours by 40% by 2020. What a deal our Negotiator in Chief made.
Ratings agencies should be very careful in attempting to utilize their power and influence to drive any particular social or political agenda. One needs only to read between the lines and understand the historical record of incrementalism to see what the future holds if this effort is allowed to take hold. The regulatory regime could easily be used to “encourage” certain behaviors by policy holders. Behaviors that may deviate significantly from what policy holders want to do, but behaviors that are desired by those driving an agenda. The net effect is a loss of individual freedom via corporate behavior driven by a compromised regulatory system. And the worst part is that the people at the end of the regulatory baton don’t get to vote for or against their behavioral masters.
I wonder what the carbon footprint was on the 1,700 billionaires who flew their jets into Switzerland for a conference on climate change.