So if the Democrat passed Obamacare was trying to coerce the states into setting up the exchanges, they failed miserably since 34 states said no thanks. They also didn’t want to expand Medicaid which can ruin a state budget in a heart beat. They also were devious calling failure to get the insurance a fine when Roberts eventually called it a tax. This whole episode cannot be screwed up more. We have Progressive Democrats to thank for the biggest travesty ever visited upon the people.
The article is clearly a biased opinion piece. In the opening, the author refers to this Obamacare challenge as an effort by conservatives when in absolute fact, it is an effort to hold the government accountable for following the laws it passes. Further, the author promotes a very liberal Justice Louis Brandeis as “the great Brandeis”. How much more biased can the author be??
I have noticed similar bias in your climate change reporting.
A credible trade publication would focus on facts and truth rather than politically driven blather. Shame on you, Insurance Journal.
Almost any article IJ publishes on Obamacare is weighted heavily toward the law, then we have 400 postings arguing about it. It should never have been passed to start with or made Constitutional since it is clearly not. Any law passed in a totally partisan way, lied about it over and over by the President and his minions, bribed and coerced lawmakers to get it passed and then not read by them before voting should disqualify it as being the law of the land.
So if the Democrat passed Obamacare was trying to coerce the states into setting up the exchanges, they failed miserably since 34 states said no thanks. They also didn’t want to expand Medicaid which can ruin a state budget in a heart beat. They also were devious calling failure to get the insurance a fine when Roberts eventually called it a tax. This whole episode cannot be screwed up more. We have Progressive Democrats to thank for the biggest travesty ever visited upon the people.
The article is clearly a biased opinion piece. In the opening, the author refers to this Obamacare challenge as an effort by conservatives when in absolute fact, it is an effort to hold the government accountable for following the laws it passes. Further, the author promotes a very liberal Justice Louis Brandeis as “the great Brandeis”. How much more biased can the author be??
I have noticed similar bias in your climate change reporting.
A credible trade publication would focus on facts and truth rather than politically driven blather. Shame on you, Insurance Journal.
Almost any article IJ publishes on Obamacare is weighted heavily toward the law, then we have 400 postings arguing about it. It should never have been passed to start with or made Constitutional since it is clearly not. Any law passed in a totally partisan way, lied about it over and over by the President and his minions, bribed and coerced lawmakers to get it passed and then not read by them before voting should disqualify it as being the law of the land.