“An internal investigation into why it took GM more than a decade to identify problems with a defective ignition switch, led by lawyer Anton Valukas, blamed a lack of urgency in the engineering and legal departments but didn’t reveal any conspiracy to conceal facts.”
With a lack of urgency, why would they need to conceal facts? Isn’t the lack of urgency a reflection on the quality of leadership at GM?
How could the government not have known about this potential liability when they bailed out GM?
According to the article…..
“An internal investigation into why it took GM more than a decade to identify problems with a defective ignition switch, led by lawyer Anton Valukas, blamed a lack of urgency in the engineering and legal departments but didn’t reveal any conspiracy to conceal facts.”
With a lack of urgency, why would they need to conceal facts? Isn’t the lack of urgency a reflection on the quality of leadership at GM?
Where is the responsibility then? Is it a Products/Completed Operations claim when a product fails and BI & PD are the result?