Congress Kills Obama Ban on Forced Arbitration in Battle Against Class Actions

By | October 25, 2017

  • October 25, 2017 at 2:27 pm
    Agent says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 10

    What great news! Another Obama era policy being killed by Republicans.

    • October 25, 2017 at 3:37 pm
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 4
      Thumb down 8

      And one of the biggest “achievements” of the Obama era is continuing to spiral to a death very close in time proximity.

      Not much benefit results from parties banding together under Class Action suits. The results are usually small payouts to each named plaintiff, and these types of actions draw unscrupulous lawyers to create actions that should never have existed if they required merit to stand alone as a single plaintiff suit.

      • October 25, 2017 at 3:47 pm
        Rosenblatt says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 7
        Thumb down 2

        I agree there are numerous class action suits that benefit the attorney’s more so than the plaintiffs. That is definitely the norm. However, I fail to see how this roll-back is a good thing.

        First – nobody is forced to join a class action suit (unless specified in previously agreed to Terms and Conditions). So those who don’t want to join a class action could always file their own case regardless of this decision.

        Second – why should the company being sued get to decide if a class action should proceed? That should be left up to the courts to determine the validity of a class action case being raised.

        Is there any situation where this change actually benefits the consumer instead of the corporation (knowing the consumer always had a choice to avoid jumping into a class action suit if they wanted)?

        • November 10, 2017 at 5:40 pm
          Agent says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 0

          Is there any condition that the lawyers don’t benefit more than the consumer?

      • October 25, 2017 at 7:46 pm
        Rosenblatt says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 1
        Thumb down 1

        I misunderstood the ToC portion of the roll-back. Although the part in parenthesis is wrong specific to the change, my sentiments remain the same.

  • October 25, 2017 at 3:38 pm
    caffiend says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 3

    So… At what cost to the people? You cheer about this, but our elected officials are supposed to represent us and protect our interests. All this is protecting is the banks and lending institutions.

  • October 25, 2017 at 5:47 pm
    Bill says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 3

    Wells Fargo has to be cheering about this decision! If there was ever a case that needs to be a class action, it’s for all the crap that Wells has been doing the past few years. Making each individual go to arbitration will mean that most will just give up and forget about it.

  • October 26, 2017 at 2:04 pm
    martin says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Sure, I was part of a class action law suit a few times. I got my $2.99 in the mail a year later.. The attorney’s are the people who win in a class suit. I would rather find an attorney that will take the case on it’s own merits.Small claims is a good place to start.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*