This is a great example of PROPER use of AI / Tech to improve safety, unlike Tesla’s use to try to turn a big profit by AI in vehicles which hasn’t been properly tested before implementation on highways and roads. The former improves safety for workers. The latter will eventually improve safety for drivers and pedestrians, but currently is giving a false sense of security, which has led to accidents that wouldn’t have happened were a human driver involved in the control of the vehicle.
What’s the point of posting that link to support your argument that vehicle AI isn’t safe when the URL clearly indicates there’s been no determination made if the Tesla was on autopilot or if this accident was solely due to an inattentive driver???
do you have any evidence that the tesla in the story you cited was NOT being operated by a human driver? you know, something besides conjecture and guessing – is there any actual proof to what you claim?
This is a great example of PROPER use of AI / Tech to improve safety, unlike Tesla’s use to try to turn a big profit by AI in vehicles which hasn’t been properly tested before implementation on highways and roads. The former improves safety for workers. The latter will eventually improve safety for drivers and pedestrians, but currently is giving a false sense of security, which has led to accidents that wouldn’t have happened were a human driver involved in the control of the vehicle.
http://www.foxnews.com/auto/2018/05/13/tesla-possibly-on-autopilot-slams-into-truck-in-dramatic-utah-wreck.html
What’s the point of posting that link to support your argument that vehicle AI isn’t safe when the URL clearly indicates there’s been no determination made if the Tesla was on autopilot or if this accident was solely due to an inattentive driver???
do you have any evidence that the tesla in the story you cited was NOT being operated by a human driver? you know, something besides conjecture and guessing – is there any actual proof to what you claim?