It won’t be properly priced until it’s taken seriously, and members of the right have an interest in denying and refuting anything to do with climate change.
It won’t be properly priced until it’s taken seriously, and members of the left have an interest in denying and refuting anything to do with solutions that would actually work.
Instead, they are more interested in anything that randomly gives the government more money and power.
And so around the world, nothing is getting done. People know a scam when they see it. And the left does nothing to convince anyone that they are serious about the problem.
This goes back to my original post. You’re trying to deflect and obfuscate when the solutions are out there, you’re just trying to pretend they’re not. All we have to do is work together towards a solution, as opposed to allowing the richest americans to continue profiting from polluting the planet while they attempt to hinder any movement to the contrary. It’s the same stance the right has taken on gun violence, you refuse to see ANY solution and so no solution can be reached. Stop listening to shills for corporate interests, stop listening to the right.
Jon: “ALL of them. Let’s do everything by taxing everyone more and giving the government more power to do what they want and tell people what they can’t do, because this is an existential crisis!!!!!!”
Craig: “Jon has vast amounts of insurance knowledge and contributes to every article with salient points. I envy him and I am not being sarcastic. Also, I totally said this because it’s in quotes and who would put something in quotes claiming the person said something if they didn’t actually say those things? I would never do that!”
You have reached Peak Babble. That post makes no sense at all, avoids any reference to the issue addressed in the article, and pretends ignorance over the point I just made (but perhaps it is not ignorance?).
Jon’s insurance knowledge has nothing to do with Climate Change, his comments are often famous for being vapid, repetitive insults only, and he confirmed the EXACT point I was making:
you “believers” have no idea how to solve climate change, and if you did you could convince a few non-believers, but the reason no one listens to you and the reason governments around the world diddle while things supposedly continue to get much worse.
You can’t even admit that the predictions of the climate scientists have been nearly universally wrong so far. And failing to address THAT fact and explaining it is reason enough not to take you seriously.
May 27, 2020 at 1:27 pm
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
4
2
Craig “I agree I lied and pretended that Jon said things he never said, so I shall deflect from my dishonest post and make some personal attacks instead.”
May 27, 2020 at 2:09 pm
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
4
1
“You can’t even admit that the predictions of the climate scientists have been nearly universally wrong so far”
FALSE STATEMENT ALERT
You clearly don’t remember me trying to explain to you what a prediction is and why they’re adjusted over time based on new data points, which I’ve done at least 5 times already.
May 27, 2020 at 2:35 pm
Jon says:
Like or Dislike:
4
2
LOL it is hilarious how over Craig’s head that went.
May 27, 2020 at 4:45 pm
Craig Winston Cornell says:
Like or Dislike:
1
4
Just hilarious: “predictions that are wrong aren’t wrong. They are just waiting for correction . . .”
Truly Rosenblatt. TOO funny.
May 27, 2020 at 9:57 pm
Jon says:
Like or Dislike:
4
1
What’s funny is your lack of ability to figure out how to use quotation marks properly. What’s sad is your repeated trolling attempts on literally every article that has the word “climate” in the title. What are you so afraid of? That people might realize you’re wrong about yet another partisan topic? Shock. Dishonest people like you are gonna just be dishonest.
May 28, 2020 at 8:49 am
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
3
1
Craig: “watch me not learn my lesson and put another thing in quotes as if I’m citing what someone actually said when really it’s just me making more Straw Man Arguments.”
May 28, 2020 at 10:47 am
Jon says:
Like or Dislike:
3
1
LOL It’s like he only learned what trolling on the internet was in 2016. Some of us have been arguing on the internet since the 90s, and yes we’re still half your age, Craig. You’re just bad at this.
It won’t be properly priced until it’s taken seriously, and members of the right have an interest in denying and refuting anything to do with climate change.
It won’t be properly priced until it’s taken seriously, and members of the left have an interest in denying and refuting anything to do with solutions that would actually work.
Instead, they are more interested in anything that randomly gives the government more money and power.
And so around the world, nothing is getting done. People know a scam when they see it. And the left does nothing to convince anyone that they are serious about the problem.
This goes back to my original post. You’re trying to deflect and obfuscate when the solutions are out there, you’re just trying to pretend they’re not. All we have to do is work together towards a solution, as opposed to allowing the richest americans to continue profiting from polluting the planet while they attempt to hinder any movement to the contrary. It’s the same stance the right has taken on gun violence, you refuse to see ANY solution and so no solution can be reached. Stop listening to shills for corporate interests, stop listening to the right.
Craig: “Which solutions?”
Jon: “ALL of them. Let’s do everything by taxing everyone more and giving the government more power to do what they want and tell people what they can’t do, because this is an existential crisis!!!!!!”
Craig: “Exactly. You proved my point.”
Craig: “Jon has vast amounts of insurance knowledge and contributes to every article with salient points. I envy him and I am not being sarcastic. Also, I totally said this because it’s in quotes and who would put something in quotes claiming the person said something if they didn’t actually say those things? I would never do that!”
You have reached Peak Babble. That post makes no sense at all, avoids any reference to the issue addressed in the article, and pretends ignorance over the point I just made (but perhaps it is not ignorance?).
Jon’s insurance knowledge has nothing to do with Climate Change, his comments are often famous for being vapid, repetitive insults only, and he confirmed the EXACT point I was making:
you “believers” have no idea how to solve climate change, and if you did you could convince a few non-believers, but the reason no one listens to you and the reason governments around the world diddle while things supposedly continue to get much worse.
You can’t even admit that the predictions of the climate scientists have been nearly universally wrong so far. And failing to address THAT fact and explaining it is reason enough not to take you seriously.
Craig “I agree I lied and pretended that Jon said things he never said, so I shall deflect from my dishonest post and make some personal attacks instead.”
“You can’t even admit that the predictions of the climate scientists have been nearly universally wrong so far”
FALSE STATEMENT ALERT
You clearly don’t remember me trying to explain to you what a prediction is and why they’re adjusted over time based on new data points, which I’ve done at least 5 times already.
LOL it is hilarious how over Craig’s head that went.
Just hilarious: “predictions that are wrong aren’t wrong. They are just waiting for correction . . .”
Truly Rosenblatt. TOO funny.
What’s funny is your lack of ability to figure out how to use quotation marks properly. What’s sad is your repeated trolling attempts on literally every article that has the word “climate” in the title. What are you so afraid of? That people might realize you’re wrong about yet another partisan topic? Shock. Dishonest people like you are gonna just be dishonest.
Craig: “watch me not learn my lesson and put another thing in quotes as if I’m citing what someone actually said when really it’s just me making more Straw Man Arguments.”
LOL It’s like he only learned what trolling on the internet was in 2016. Some of us have been arguing on the internet since the 90s, and yes we’re still half your age, Craig. You’re just bad at this.