In South Carolina, Concern Over Flood Premiums Affecting Historic Preservation

By | March 26, 2014

  • March 26, 2014 at 10:20 pm
    jw says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Why not have the banks assume some of the risk. they are the benefactors of NFIP and it was created for them to protect the collateral. Make flood a “no recourse peril” on the loan. We bailed out the banks let them bail out NFIP. tit for tat.

  • April 1, 2014 at 6:03 pm
    Serafina says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    If you are concerned about the huge flood insurance premium increases, join us online at Stopfemanow.com. We are a very active national group of homeowners fighting for affordable flood insurance, to repeal and delay Biggert Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012. We have chapters in every state but need you to help us. Get facts, not rumors, come join Stopfemanow.com and like us on Facebook.

    • April 1, 2014 at 11:24 pm
      jw says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Thanks for the invite, but NO THANKS……we need to get rid of the taxpayers subsidies for developing areas where we shouldn’t develop. Artificial low rates are the problem.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*