California Insurers Oppose Giving Punitive Damages to State August 31, 2006 Email This Subscribe to Newsletter Email to a friend Facebook Tweet LinkedIn Print Article Article 4 Comments August 31, 2006 at 1:12 am fig dude says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Nice try. It is not the first of April yet and already you are trying to pull one over on us readers. No sane person(s) would every concoct something as stupid as this, or would they? Reply August 31, 2006 at 2:46 am Bill says: Like or Dislike: 0 0I think that SB832 makes sense if we are to believe that punitive damages are to punish the defendant rather than compensate the plaintiff. Fines to the state are common forms of punishment. Reply August 31, 2006 at 2:48 am bj says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Hey, it\’s CA. What do you expect???? Reply August 31, 2006 at 3:19 am County Line says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Bill must be a plaintiff attorney if he thinks this is a just piece of legislation. Who else in their right mind could ever side with these out-of-control self annointed legislators/confiscators? Welcome to the Peoples\’ Republic of California. Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * Email * Comment ΔNotify me of comments via e-mail
Nice try. It is not the first of April yet and already you are trying to pull one over on us readers. No sane person(s) would every concoct something as stupid as this, or would they?
I think that SB832 makes sense if we are to believe that punitive damages are to punish the defendant rather than compensate the plaintiff.
Fines to the state are common forms of punishment.
Hey, it\’s CA. What do you expect????
Bill must be a plaintiff attorney if he thinks this is a just piece of legislation.
Who else in their right mind could ever side with these out-of-control self annointed legislators/confiscators?
Welcome to the Peoples\’ Republic of California.