‘MythBusters’ Cannonball Rips Through House, Van

December 8, 2011

  • December 8, 2011 at 1:44 pm
    ft says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    who lives right behind a gun range that allows cannon fire? Am I missing something?

  • December 8, 2011 at 1:44 pm
    BryFi says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Jamie like Big Boom

  • December 8, 2011 at 1:46 pm
    reality bites says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Thankfully the cannon wasn’t a Myth-ter Buster. Otherwise Jasbir would’ve been on a medical reality show for freak accidents, with a third ball.

  • December 8, 2011 at 3:12 pm
    Big Mike In CA says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    This is responding to FT. The Sheriff’s Dept gun range is separated from the community of Dublin, CA first by the 9-to-12 ft tall hill behind the targets to absorb bullets fired on the range, and then a downhill slope toward a six-lane highway. Had not the cannonball bounced up and over the hill, it wouldn’t have gotten away.

    And it would be more likely that the gun range was built AFTER the neighborhood was…

    • December 8, 2011 at 5:21 pm
      Not so sure, Big Mike says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      I would think that the gun range was built long before the neighborhood….just like airports that once were WAY out of town.

  • December 9, 2011 at 10:12 am
    Doug says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What kind of insurance policy would cover this? A general liability policy? Do you think it is Excess & Surplus or part of the production company’s larger corporate policy?

    • December 12, 2011 at 1:40 pm
      Dani says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      I would think that it would have to be some sort of excess & surplus probably even a special event policy –

  • December 9, 2011 at 1:32 pm
    BUCKEYE IN MOTOWN says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    i hope we get to see the reaction of the guys on discovery channel.

  • December 12, 2011 at 10:24 am
    Exadjuster says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I can just picture Jammie dead panning to the camera, “Well, that didn’t go as well as expected.”

  • December 12, 2011 at 11:16 am
    Betty says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I would say someone is living right. While it was an unfortunate accident, no one was hurt.

  • December 12, 2011 at 10:49 pm
    Taina says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I would say that this would fall under the General Liability… Discovery Channel is liable for the damage to both home and auto involved. The surplus would cover more like the location where they mostly film. The contents and machinery if stolen or burned down ect.. Most of these would have to carry no less than 2,000,000 General Aggregate.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*