Wyoming Lower Court to Reconsider Errant Golf Ball Lawsuit

By | September 17, 2012

  • September 17, 2012 at 1:56 pm
    Ed B. says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Q. Why did the golfer wear 2 pairs of pants?

    A. In case he got a hole in one.

  • September 17, 2012 at 3:12 pm
    Ruminator says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Errant golf balls should be an automatic assumption of risk anytime golf clubs at present.

  • September 17, 2012 at 3:54 pm
    Tom Bruckmeyer says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I agree errant golf balls are a fact of life when on a course. The information given here though is questionable. The claimant was at the side of the green and a volunteer told the guy to go ahead and hit. Clearly the player recognized there was some danger. Depending on how close the spectator was to the green, the shot may not have been really errant. I would think it would prudent to allow the green and green side to clear before shooting at the people. Then again I only dream about hitting a tee shot 320 yards. I would mostly endanger those 150 yards and to the left!!!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*