I don’t understand at all why the liquor industry thinks they are solely entitled to marijuana distributor licenses. Can someone explain the rationale? It isn’t clear from the article.
they are literally using the 1 sentence referendum question, “…that marijuana should be regulated like alcohol…” to mean that they have exclusive distribution rights between producers and retailers.
and so they sued and now a judge is deciding what that language really means..
I don’t understand at all why the liquor industry thinks they are solely entitled to marijuana distributor licenses. Can someone explain the rationale? It isn’t clear from the article.
they are literally using the 1 sentence referendum question, “…that marijuana should be regulated like alcohol…” to mean that they have exclusive distribution rights between producers and retailers.
and so they sued and now a judge is deciding what that language really means..