East News

Mass. Jury Awards $26.5 Million In Birth of Disabled Child

A Suffolk Superior Court jury in Boston has awarded $26.5 million to a 10-year-old boy and his parents after the family argued in a lawsuit that he was severely injured during a delayed delivery at Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Advertisement

Two obstetricians — Doctors Alisa Goldberg and Julie Miner — were found negligent after a two-week trial. A nurse was cleared of negligence.

Jose Bejarano Jr., of Brockton, has cerebral palsy, is confined to a wheelchair and must be fed through a tube. The boy's parents claimed in their lawsuit that their son's injuries were caused when the doctors delayed delivering him by Caesarean section.

Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly said it is the largest medical malpractice jury verdict so far this year in the state.

"It was a six- to eight-hour delay in performing a C-section in a baby that was showing signs of fetal distress on a fetal monitor,'' said Florence Carey, one of the family's attorneys.

The baby was eventually delivered by another set of doctors using forceps.

Edward Hinchey, an attorney for the doctors, said they were "stunned and disappointed'' by the verdict. He said they will appeal.

"We continue to believe that both of these physicians are outstanding doctors,'' Hinchey said. "The case had been reviewed by many obstetrical experts, who were all supportive of the care and believe that the care was excellent.''

"The mom had some risk factors for having in-utero problems and there was some evidence that there were some problems before she actually came to the hospital,'' he said.

The hospital issued a statement saying the doctors gave the highest standard of medical care.

"Despite the talents and skills of our medical teams, events can arise during a pregnancy, and, tragically, not all outcomes are perfect,'' the hospital said, adding that its staff was sympathetic to the pain suffered by the Bejarano family.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie lastbat
Oct 22, 2007, 2:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie BTS
Oct 22, 2007, 2:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie lastbat
Oct 22, 2007, 2:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie BTS
Oct 22, 2007, 11:14 am
Wow a lot of comments ad
Oct 22, 2007, 10:50 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie SP
Oct 18, 2007, 4:38 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie lastbat
Oct 18, 2007, 4:17 pm
RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie Mary B.
Oct 18, 2007, 4:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie Shield
Oct 18, 2007, 3:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie lastbat
Oct 18, 2007, 2:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie Abu Bakr
Oct 18, 2007, 12:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm David
Oct 17, 2007, 4:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: It's a child, not a choice lastbat
Oct 17, 2007, 4:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm lastbat
Oct 17, 2007, 4:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm David
Oct 17, 2007, 3:45 pm
RE: RE: You Tell Em Rosie Willy
Oct 17, 2007, 3:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm SP
Oct 17, 2007, 3:20 pm
RE: You Tell Em Rosie Willy
Oct 17, 2007, 3:18 pm
RE: You Tell Em Rosie Shield
Oct 17, 2007, 3:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm David
Oct 17, 2007, 3:11 pm
You Tell Em Rosie Sheila Jackson Lee
Oct 17, 2007, 3:07 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: It's a child, not a choice Willy
Oct 17, 2007, 3:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: It's a child, not a choice Willy
Oct 17, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm SP
Oct 17, 2007, 3:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: It's a child, not a choice David
Oct 17, 2007, 2:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: It's a child, not a choice Rosie
Oct 17, 2007, 2:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: It's a child, not a choice Mary B.
Oct 17, 2007, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm david
Oct 17, 2007, 1:47 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm SP
Oct 17, 2007, 11:35 am
RE: RE: RE: Hmmmm Shield
Oct 17, 2007, 11:21 am
RE: RE: Hmmmm David
Oct 17, 2007, 11:14 am
RE: Hmmmm SP
Oct 17, 2007, 10:14 am
RE: RE: It's a child, not a choice Willy
Oct 17, 2007, 9:45 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Choice Shield
Oct 17, 2007, 9:27 am
RE: RE: RE: Choice Willy
Oct 17, 2007, 9:23 am
RE: RE: Choice Pat
Oct 17, 2007, 9:17 am
RE: Disabled Child speaks thru lawyer Willy
Oct 16, 2007, 2:12 pm
RE: Disabled Child Shield
Oct 16, 2007, 2:02 pm
Disabled Child Tinkerbell
Oct 16, 2007, 1:50 pm
RE: Jury Award Wishing For Child
Oct 16, 2007, 12:50 pm
RE: RE: Choice Willy
Oct 16, 2007, 8:37 am
RE: Choice Hank
Oct 16, 2007, 8:22 am
RE: RE: Choice Willy
Oct 16, 2007, 7:55 am
RE: Choice David
Oct 15, 2007, 7:32 pm
Choice Pat
Oct 15, 2007, 4:15 pm
RE: RE: See how it's cyclical??? Shield
Oct 15, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: Hmmmm Mary B.
Oct 15, 2007, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: See how it's cyclical??? Claims Guy
Oct 15, 2007, 2:31 pm
RE: See how it's cyclical??? Fred
Oct 15, 2007, 2:16 pm
Jury Award Appelate Verdict
Oct 15, 2007, 2:14 pm
See how it's cyclical??? Willy
Oct 15, 2007, 2:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: delay?? Frankie
Oct 15, 2007, 1:46 pm
RE: RE: RE: delay?? sandie
Oct 15, 2007, 1:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: delay?? Shield
Oct 15, 2007, 1:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: delay?? Willy
Oct 15, 2007, 1:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: delay?? Frankie
Oct 15, 2007, 1:26 pm
RE: RE: delay?? Willy
Oct 15, 2007, 1:20 pm
RE: RE: delay?? Joey
Oct 15, 2007, 1:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: delay?? Fred
Oct 15, 2007, 12:50 pm
RE: RE: delay?? I agree
Oct 15, 2007, 12:41 pm
RE: RE: delay?? wa
Oct 15, 2007, 12:40 pm
RE: delay?? eb
Oct 15, 2007, 11:19 am
delay?? sandie
Oct 15, 2007, 10:11 am
Hmmmm lastbat
Oct 15, 2007, 10:09 am