Connecticut Agents’ Group Urges State to Drop Cat-Fund Plan

February 18, 2009

Separate emails using a comma.

A trade group for Connecticut insurance agents is urging lawmakers to abandon plans to create a state natural catastrophe fund.

The Professional Insurance Agents of Connecticut (PIACT) said the state’s Insurance and Real Estate Committee should oppose Senate Bill 530, which create the fund.

Although the association said it supports the concept of a public reinsurance mechanism for insurers, creating a state fund would be ill-advised without a federal backstop.



“A standalone, strictly state-based catastrophe funding mechanism would create a false sense of security for the state’s homeowners,” said Michael Keating, president of PIACT. “Without a federal plan in place, the state could fail to provide adequate cash in the event of a major disaster.”



PIACT said Connecticut should be prepared to consider a state-level fund only in the context of qualifying for a pre-existing federal plan. This would involve the federal government at high, statewide levels of loss, so that traditional insurers could be correctly reserved for low-frequency, high-severity events.

“Until a decision is made on the national level, creating any kind of regional fund is the wrong choice,” Keating said.
__

Source: PIACT

Separate emails using a comma.
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • February 20, 2009 at 8:42 am
    Icee says:
    Thanks David. Your explanation makes sense if bud guy was talking direct companies vs reinsurance companies. But I think he is talking direct writers vs independent agent comp... read more
  • February 19, 2009 at 1:12 am
    David says:
    Icee, I would like to hear bud guy's answer to your questions too, but I think a cat fund may be a subsidy to direct writers because if the gvt. will step in and pay claims in... read more
  • February 19, 2009 at 12:44 pm
    Icee says:
    I must be missing something. Can you please explain to me how this is a subsidy to direct writers?
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features