So given the plaintiff’s argument… people who smoke cigarettes should know smoking will cause cancer and therefore no awards should be fund against tobacco companies (at least not since warning labels have been put on packs of cigarettes).
How is the decision of the court absurd? Let me guess, you are one of “those people” that believe we should allow frivolous lawsuits to clog our system and cost us all more money in the end?
This lawsuit was a joke. Technically, exhaling is bad for the environment. Should we go ahead and bill every human on earth for breathing? lol What about those pesky cows tearing up our ozone with their noxious fumes? We could go on all day here. The next time I get a sunburn, I’m suing a Farmer!!
So given the plaintiff’s argument… people who smoke cigarettes should know smoking will cause cancer and therefore no awards should be fund against tobacco companies (at least not since warning labels have been put on packs of cigarettes).
The decision by the court is absurd, especially as it appears it was made on the duty to defend.
How is the decision of the court absurd? Let me guess, you are one of “those people” that believe we should allow frivolous lawsuits to clog our system and cost us all more money in the end?
This lawsuit was a joke. Technically, exhaling is bad for the environment. Should we go ahead and bill every human on earth for breathing? lol What about those pesky cows tearing up our ozone with their noxious fumes? We could go on all day here. The next time I get a sunburn, I’m suing a Farmer!!