Guy Carpenter Says ‘Global Warming’ a Reality – Citing IPCC Report

September 18, 2013

An article from Guy Carpenter states: “According to the IPCC Fourth Annual Assessment Report (AR4), the scientific consensus is that global warming is indeed an established scientific fact. The evidence is undeniable, and includes:
1. Increasing air temperatures
2. Increasing ocean water temperatures
3. Tree ring characteristics
4. Ice core sample chemical characteristics
5. Ice cap retreat”

The IPCC is scheduled to release its fifth Annual Assessment report in Stockholm next week.

Guy Carp acknowledges that there has been “climate variability” over time, but it points out that the “rate of warming” over the past 30-40 years “is believed to be unprecedented.”

Two charts are included as part of the article. They show the increase in the global mean air temperature as compared to the 1951 to 1980 average rising steeply, and the increase in average oceanic heat content for depths of the 0-700 meter layer, which has also increased markedly. “The increase in oceanic heat content is notable because it takes a very large amount of energy to heat such a large volume of water,” the article points out.

The report notes that “global warming is caused by what is known as the ‘greenhouse effect,’ where greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane absorb radiation emitted by the Earth, and re-emit that radiation back towards the surface, causing a warming effect.

“The process is very similar to how car windows work on a sunny day – the glass allows energy from the sun to heat the interior of a car but traps the heat before it escapes from the car.

“Greenhouse gases are responsible for the fact that the mean temperature of the Earth is 15 degrees (Celsius) [59°F] instead of minus 18 degrees (Celsius) [app.0°F]. However, the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gases since the industrial revolution is unprecedented in the Earth’s history. According to the IPCC AR4 (2007), ‘most of the observed increase in global average temperatures is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.

“Greenhouse gas forcing alone would likely have resulted in a greater warming than observed if there had not been an offsetting cooling effect from aerosol and other forcings. It is extremely unlikely (less than five percent) that the global pattern of warming can be explained without external forcing, and very unlikely that it is due to known natural external causes alone.’”

As the Earth continues to warm, the air can hold more water vapor, which is a far more effective greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Water vapor can accelerate the warming process further.

Guy Carp’s report also points out that the IPCC has “further concluded, based on consistent and scientifically defensible evidence, that “warming of the last half-century cannot be explained without external radiative forcing’” (IPCC AR4, Working Group I, Section 9.7). So in essence, it is most unlikely that recent warming can be explained by natural variability alone.

“Scientists use a collection of global climate models (GCMs) to estimate the implications of global warming through the end of the century. While any single model demonstrates considerable error, the collection or ensemble of models has reasonably captured the climate change history of the past century. What is even more remarkable is that if greenhouse gas levels are held to pre-industrial levels in the GCMs, these models show a much colder climate between the Nineteenth Century and the present day than was actually observed. The same models are used for forward projections through the end of the century, under expected greenhouse gas concentrations.

“Global climate model ensembles project a best estimate of a further two to four degree (Celsius) [3.6°F to 7.2°F) increase in the mean temperature of the Earth by the end of the century. This seems minor on an intuitive level. However the resulting impacts are of significant concern.

“Sea-level rise presents the most significant threat for coastal areas as a result of melting glaciers and thermal expansion of ocean waters. Apart from this threat, changing weather patterns will impose drought and inland flood threats for many areas.

“As a general principle of climate change, some modification to the mean of meteorological extreme value distributions can be expected, but with a more concerning increase in tail thickness (or variability).

“This change could amplify the effects of existing natural variability modes, such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which already cause severe disruption due to flood, drought and hurricane frequency. The meteorological consequences of global warming are expected to be most severe in high latitudes and particularly in the polar regions.”

Source: Guy Carpenter and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • September 25, 2013 at 5:38 pm
    No Doubt says:
    the thing to remember about science is that in a quest for the right answers, science is pretty much wrong along the way until someone finds the right answer. What I see that ... read more
  • September 20, 2013 at 5:31 pm
    R James says:
    Exactly right. The more you study the data, the more you see that it doesn't support the AGW hypothesis. For example, the theory predicted a hot spot in the atmosphere over th... read more
  • September 20, 2013 at 5:22 pm
    R James says:
    Satellite records for the Arctic go back 30 something years. In the past submarines have surfaced at the South Pole, and of course, the Northwest passage is known to have been... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features