The Supreme Court of Michigan recently ruled that the state’s No-Fault Insurance Act prohibits health care providers from charging more than a reasonable fee for services and left it up to lower courts to determine what is reasonable when a dispute arises, according to a statement on the matter released by the Des Plaines, Ill.-based Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.
In the case of Advocacy Organization for Patients & Providers v. Auto Club Insurance Association, et al., the Supreme Court upheld the Michigan Court of Appeals ruling that the No-Fault Act expressly permits and the legislative intent was that insurance carriers review medical invoices for the reasonableness of the fees being charged.
The plaintiffs argued that medical providers are entitled to charge whatever fee they deem appropriate, so long as they charge patients with or without insurance the same fee—regardless of the reasonableness. The defendants argued that the plaintiff’s position was contrary to the clear mandate of the No-Fault Act that medical providers charge a reasonable amount for the products, services and accommodations offered to patients.
The trial court ruled the insurers were entitled to review any medical charges and pay only those determined to be reasonable. The trial court further ruled that even though a medical provider’s charge does not exceed the amount the provider customarily charges in cases not involving insurance, that fact alone does not establish that the charge is reasonable.


Banks Still Face Legal Claims After $25 Billion Settlement
MF Global Judge to Examine Insurance Payments for Former Executives
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case


