Midwest News

Insurer Told to Pay $8 Million to Missouri Couple Acquitted of Fraud

State Farm Insurance has been ordered to pay more than $8 million to a tow truck driver and his sister-in-law who were acquitted of insurance fraud after being accused of faking the theft of a vehicle.

Jackson County Circuit Judge Charles Atwell said he would award $4.5 million to Jennie Hampton, of suburban Olathe, Kan., owner of the Toyota 4Runner reported stolen in 1997, and $4.2 million to Marvin Vail, 33, of Edgerton, Kan.

"We felt that a significant punitive award was justified, particularly given State Farm's size and conduct,'' said Attorney James P. Frickleton, who represented Hampton and Vail. "We're very pleased with the court's decision and feel it's a continuing vindication of Ms. Hampton and Mr. Vail.''

Hampton and Vail sued State Farm Insurance and the National Insurance Crime Bureau, an organization that investigates insurance fraud.

Jurors in September awarded $800,000 in damages to the pair after finding they were the victims of malicious prosecution. But the decision on punitive damages was left to Atwell.

The crime bureau settled with the pair after trial.

Bloomington-based State Farm did not immediately return messages left by The Associated Press.

After Hampton's vehicle was found burned in rural Miami County, Kan., in December 1997, State Farm refused to pay her claim. The company accused her of lying in claiming that the Toyota's engine was in "excellent'' condition before the reported theft, citing reports from several witnesses who told investigators she had talked about engine problems and was looking for a new engine a few weeks before the event.

One witness was reported to have overheard Vail, who worked as a tow-truck driver, stating that he was involved in towing the vehicle to where it was burned.

Through the insurance crime bureau, the case was forwarded to the district attorney's office in Johnson County, Kan., which filed charges. Hampton and Vail were acquitted in May 2001.

Frickleton said State Farm and the insurance crime bureau relied on incomplete, hearsay evidence in seeking the fraud prosecution.

The attorney for State Farm argued at trial that an analysis showed that the engine was damaged before the fire.

The award Atwell ordered included an adjustment to account for the settlement with the crime bureau.

Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Are there no prisons and work houses and poor houses MUD
Dec 19, 2005, 12:32 pm
Are there no prisons and work houses and poor houses" Mr MU Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 19, 2005, 11:56 am
Gee MUD -- Sen. Lott Sues State Farm Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 17, 2005, 11:34 am
RE: As we speak -- Mr. MUD MUD
Dec 16, 2005, 12:16 pm
As we speak -- Mr. MUD
Dec 16, 2005, 11:32 am
RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD MUD
Dec 16, 2005, 11:04 am
K.T. MUD
Dec 16, 2005, 7:21 am
RE: Shouldn't MUD
Dec 16, 2005, 7:09 am
Shouldn't "equality be the goal", Mr. MUD? Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 15, 2005, 9:39 pm
No harm done? -- Gee MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 15, 2005, 6:30 pm
RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD MUD
Dec 15, 2005, 12:31 pm
RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 15, 2005, 11:18 am
RE: Mr. MUD MUD
Dec 15, 2005, 11:14 am
Mr. MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 15, 2005, 10:59 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD MUD
Dec 15, 2005, 10:43 am
The Judge, not the jury set the punitive damages -- Mr. MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 15, 2005, 10:40 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD
Dec 15, 2005, 10:19 am
RE: RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD MUD
Dec 15, 2005, 7:18 am
RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD MUD
Dec 15, 2005, 7:12 am
No harm done? -- Gee MUD Carla
Dec 14, 2005, 4:37 pm
RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 14, 2005, 4:37 pm
RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD MUD
Dec 14, 2005, 3:57 pm
RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD MUD
Dec 14, 2005, 3:41 pm
No harm done? -- Gee MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 14, 2005, 3:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: No harm done? -- MUD MUD
Dec 14, 2005, 2:15 pm
RE: RE: No harm done? -- MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 14, 2005, 1:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud MUD
Dec 14, 2005, 10:23 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud MUD
Dec 14, 2005, 10:20 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud MUD
Dec 14, 2005, 10:14 am
RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud Carla
Dec 14, 2005, 9:58 am
RE: RE: RE: Purely Coincidental Carla
Dec 14, 2005, 9:48 am
kerwin LL
Dec 10, 2005, 9:35 am
RE: No harm done? -- MUD MUD
Dec 9, 2005, 7:46 am
RE: No harm done? -- MUD MUD
Dec 9, 2005, 7:04 am
sf Agent? Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 8, 2005, 7:43 pm
Jury Tells State Farm to Pay Up -- MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 8, 2005, 7:39 pm
No harm done? -- MUD Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 8, 2005, 7:28 pm
RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud MUD
Dec 8, 2005, 8:19 am
RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud Mitch
Dec 8, 2005, 8:11 am
RE: State Farm as a 5 time loser! Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 7, 2005, 8:37 pm
State Farm as a 5 time loser! Kerwin Tschetter
Dec 7, 2005, 6:26 pm
RE: sf $8 mn paid Retired Underwriter
Dec 7, 2005, 6:13 pm
sf $8 mn paid sf agent
Dec 7, 2005, 6:05 pm
RE: Another one bits the dust MUD
Dec 7, 2005, 2:51 pm
RE: RE: Another one bits the dust Jim
Dec 7, 2005, 2:29 pm
RE: Another one bits the dust Chris
Dec 7, 2005, 2:22 pm
Another one bits the dust Dumb
Dec 7, 2005, 2:08 pm
RE: RE: Purely Coincidental Reagan
Dec 7, 2005, 2:08 pm
RE: Purely Coincidental Chris
Dec 7, 2005, 1:15 pm
Purely Coincidental Deacon Jones
Dec 7, 2005, 12:54 pm
A little confused... Chris
Dec 7, 2005, 12:35 pm
no way. go to this site Garrett
Dec 7, 2005, 10:17 am
stupid urmom
Dec 7, 2005, 10:12 am