Midwest News
Insurer Told to Pay $8 Million to Missouri Couple Acquitted of Fraud
December 7, 2005
State Farm Insurance has been ordered to pay more than $8 million to a tow truck driver and his sister-in-law who were acquitted of insurance fraud after being accused of faking the theft of a vehicle.
Jackson County Circuit Judge Charles Atwell said he would award $4.5 million to Jennie Hampton, of suburban Olathe, Kan., owner of the Toyota 4Runner reported stolen in 1997, and $4.2 million to Marvin Vail, 33, of Edgerton, Kan.
"We felt that a significant punitive award was justified, particularly given State Farm's size and conduct,'' said Attorney James P. Frickleton, who represented Hampton and Vail. "We're very pleased with the court's decision and feel it's a continuing vindication of Ms. Hampton and Mr. Vail.''
Hampton and Vail sued State Farm Insurance and the National Insurance Crime Bureau, an organization that investigates insurance fraud.
Jurors in September awarded $800,000 in damages to the pair after finding they were the victims of malicious prosecution. But the decision on punitive damages was left to Atwell.
The crime bureau settled with the pair after trial.
Bloomington-based State Farm did not immediately return messages left by The Associated Press.
After Hampton's vehicle was found burned in rural Miami County, Kan., in December 1997, State Farm refused to pay her claim. The company accused her of lying in claiming that the Toyota's engine was in "excellent'' condition before the reported theft, citing reports from several witnesses who told investigators she had talked about engine problems and was looking for a new engine a few weeks before the event.
One witness was reported to have overheard Vail, who worked as a tow-truck driver, stating that he was involved in towing the vehicle to where it was burned.
Through the insurance crime bureau, the case was forwarded to the district attorney's office in Johnson County, Kan., which filed charges. Hampton and Vail were acquitted in May 2001.
Frickleton said State Farm and the insurance crime bureau relied on incomplete, hearsay evidence in seeking the fraud prosecution.
The attorney for State Farm argued at trial that an analysis showed that the engine was damaged before the fire.
The award Atwell ordered included an adjustment to account for the settlement with the crime bureau.
Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| RE: Are there no prisons and work houses and poor houses |
MUD |
Dec 19, 2005, 12:32 pm |
| Are there no prisons and work houses and poor houses" Mr MU |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 19, 2005, 11:56 am |
| Gee MUD -- Sen. Lott Sues State Farm |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 17, 2005, 11:34 am |
| RE: As we speak -- Mr. MUD |
MUD |
Dec 16, 2005, 12:16 pm |
| As we speak -- Mr. MUD |
|
Dec 16, 2005, 11:32 am |
| RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
MUD |
Dec 16, 2005, 11:04 am |
| K.T. |
MUD |
Dec 16, 2005, 7:21 am |
| RE: Shouldn't |
MUD |
Dec 16, 2005, 7:09 am |
| Shouldn't "equality be the goal", Mr. MUD? |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 15, 2005, 9:39 pm |
| No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 15, 2005, 6:30 pm |
| RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
MUD |
Dec 15, 2005, 12:31 pm |
| RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 15, 2005, 11:18 am |
| RE: Mr. MUD |
MUD |
Dec 15, 2005, 11:14 am |
| Mr. MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 15, 2005, 10:59 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
MUD |
Dec 15, 2005, 10:43 am |
| The Judge, not the jury set the punitive damages -- Mr. MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 15, 2005, 10:40 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
|
Dec 15, 2005, 10:19 am |
| RE: RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
MUD |
Dec 15, 2005, 7:18 am |
| RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
MUD |
Dec 15, 2005, 7:12 am |
| No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
Carla |
Dec 14, 2005, 4:37 pm |
| RE: RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 14, 2005, 4:37 pm |
| RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
MUD |
Dec 14, 2005, 3:57 pm |
| RE: No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
MUD |
Dec 14, 2005, 3:41 pm |
| No harm done? -- Gee MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 14, 2005, 3:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: No harm done? -- MUD |
MUD |
Dec 14, 2005, 2:15 pm |
| RE: RE: No harm done? -- MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 14, 2005, 1:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud |
MUD |
Dec 14, 2005, 10:23 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud |
MUD |
Dec 14, 2005, 10:20 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud |
MUD |
Dec 14, 2005, 10:14 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud |
Carla |
Dec 14, 2005, 9:58 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Purely Coincidental |
Carla |
Dec 14, 2005, 9:48 am |
| kerwin |
LL |
Dec 10, 2005, 9:35 am |
| RE: No harm done? -- MUD |
MUD |
Dec 9, 2005, 7:46 am |
| RE: No harm done? -- MUD |
MUD |
Dec 9, 2005, 7:04 am |
| sf Agent? |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 8, 2005, 7:43 pm |
| Jury Tells State Farm to Pay Up -- MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 8, 2005, 7:39 pm |
| No harm done? -- MUD |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 8, 2005, 7:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud |
MUD |
Dec 8, 2005, 8:19 am |
| RE: Insurance Industry is One Big Piece of Fraud |
Mitch |
Dec 8, 2005, 8:11 am |
| RE: State Farm as a 5 time loser! |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 7, 2005, 8:37 pm |
| State Farm as a 5 time loser! |
Kerwin Tschetter |
Dec 7, 2005, 6:26 pm |
| RE: sf $8 mn paid |
Retired Underwriter |
Dec 7, 2005, 6:13 pm |
| sf $8 mn paid |
sf agent |
Dec 7, 2005, 6:05 pm |
| RE: Another one bits the dust |
MUD |
Dec 7, 2005, 2:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Another one bits the dust |
Jim |
Dec 7, 2005, 2:29 pm |
| RE: Another one bits the dust |
Chris |
Dec 7, 2005, 2:22 pm |
| Another one bits the dust |
Dumb |
Dec 7, 2005, 2:08 pm |
| RE: RE: Purely Coincidental |
Reagan |
Dec 7, 2005, 2:08 pm |
| RE: Purely Coincidental |
Chris |
Dec 7, 2005, 1:15 pm |
| Purely Coincidental |
Deacon Jones |
Dec 7, 2005, 12:54 pm |
| A little confused... |
Chris |
Dec 7, 2005, 12:35 pm |
| no way. go to this site |
Garrett |
Dec 7, 2005, 10:17 am |
| stupid |
urmom |
Dec 7, 2005, 10:12 am |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article