Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
Montana Enacts Insurance Compact Legislation
Bill Limits California Workers’ Comp for Pro Athletes
Sandy Changing the Way Underwriters View Northeast
TRIA Debate Heats Up with Charge ‘Nervous Nelly’ P/C Insurers Enjoy $7B ‘Subsidy’
Criminal Investigation Launched into Texas Fertilizer Explosion
Jail for Washington Man Faking Work Injuries for Drugs
Homeowners not the Only Line of Insurance Affected by Texas WeatherFree Newsletters
Sign up to receive insurance news alerts!Most Popular
Current Issue
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Soon you will have to strike off one advantage of driving a fuel efficient car… less gas used = less tax paid.
I think some of this is just redundant. Why not just stick with punishment based on outcome and let drivers make their own decisions? Forget banning cell phones, eating, farding, etc., while driving. Let\’s just set the fine at $1000 per 1/4 mile backup on highways and a flat rate for non-highways. If you want to drive while doing something else, then it is your financial risk.