The Wisconsin Supreme Court says a father who accidentally severed the feet of his two-year-old son with a riding lawnmower cannot hold the manufacturer liable for the injury.
In a 4-2 decision, the court ruled that bystanders, such as the boy, do not have any greater protections than consumers from dangerous products.
The 2004 case involves a father who was mowing his yard, put his John Deere lawnmower in reverse and ran into his son. The boy now wears prosthetics on both legs.
The decision means the family cannot get a new trial in a lawsuit that claimed Moline, Ill.-based Deere & Co. should not have allowed the mower to work in reverse.
Justice Michael Gableman says it was a horrible accident but was caused by the “negligent use of the lawn mower and negligent supervision of the boy by his parents.”
henry mitchell says: 
Paul Shearer says: 
Mike says: 
Banks Still Face Legal Claims After $25 Billion Settlement
MF Global Judge to Examine Insurance Payments for Former Executives
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case
