Free Newsletters
Most Popular
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
- GOP Questions Fundraising for Obamacare
- ‘Major Disaster’ Declared in Wake of Deadly Oklahoma Tornadoes
- Brokerage Firm Fined $9M for Email Violations, Misstatements
- Opioid Epidemic Plagues Workers’ Comp
- On a Leash: Dog Bite Insurance Claim Trends
- 50 Top Apps for Independent Agents
- 10 Things to Know About the Trucking Industry
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance Office
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
- GOP Questions Fundraising for ObamacareMay 21, 2013 | Comments (29)
- House Farm Bill Expands Crop Insurance, Cuts Food StampsMay 16, 2013 | Comments (28)
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance OfficeMay 17, 2013 | Comments (13)
- Will Supreme Court Enter Climate Change Debate?May 16, 2013 | Comments (12)
- Oregon City Employee Suing Over Co-Worker ScentMay 16, 2013 | Comments (9)
Current Issue
Partner Center
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Quote of Note
The Executive is not convinced that there is currently a persuasive argument to support the need for insurance for firearms in the home.
More QuotesChester McPherson, deputy commissioner of the D.C. Department of Insurance

Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing Companies
Medical Malpractice Payouts Not Driving Up Health Costs: Study
Florida Lawmakers Approve Medical Malpractice Reform
Industry Results Show Positive Signs for Workers’ Comp Line, NCCI’s Chief Economist Says



Think people not responsible enough to buy a $8 smoke alarm when they have kids in the home will buy a $3 new battery every year? Yeah,right.
This has to be the most ridiculous example of a Nanny State that I have ever seen! You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink. They have/had the same program in Philadelphia and every time there’s a major fire the smoke detector either didn’t work or the battery had been taken out of it.
Can the government just leave us all alone and let us run our own lives?
A $300,000 grant to buy 11,600 smoke detectors means a cost of approximately $26 each. Funny, you can buy them at a big box store for under $5.00. And by the way, Washington does not have a spending problem? What a fraud and waste of taxpayer money!
I think the money would have been better spent installing fire hydrants or adding additional personel. I have actually found UL approved smoke detectors at the local “$” store for less than $2.
So, if they have not invested that little in the detector, will they–as it has been posed-in fact invest in replacement batteries? Or is this grant going to supply those every year as well.[No one takes personal responsibility anymore.]
This is just a political campaign for someone who can say look at what I did and who might actually talk themselves into feeling good about it.
I think this is a wonderful way to spend tax dollars. I’d rather have my tax dollars help prevent fire related injury and death than go to drone attacks and corporate bail-outs. A very small minority of people who receive government benefits ever abuse them. Thousands of families in Iowa will be spared the decision of whether to spend the last of their money on the smoke detector, rent, groceries, gas, phone bills, etc. There will be thousands of very grateful mothers and fathers that will be resting a bit easier knowing they have a smoke detector in the home. Tax payer money is meant to help the community, and smoke alarms do help the community. When a smoke alarm goes off, a family has more time to evacuate the home, which helps the fire fighters protect themselves when they can avoid dangerous rescue missions. How selfish Americans can be to think that the fraction of a penny that they paid toward this is a waste when it will save lives.
I’m happy for the thousands of mothers and fathers who can rest with the comfort of knowing they have a smoke detector in the home. For less fortunate families, $5 means a lot. $5 is the gas to get your kids to school, to chip away at the phone/electric/heating/rent. Tax payer dollars are meant to make a community better and safer. When a smoke detector alerts a family of a fire, they are able to evacuate their home quicker, which means a faster response from fire fighters. This fast response will allow fire fighters to control the fire quicker, lessening the risk of it spreading. And since the smoke detector alerted the family, it makes it more likely that they can safely evacuate the home without injury. The safe evacuation of a family can save a fire fighter’s life by eliminating risky rescue attempts. 300k would be a tiny fraction of a percent of an individual’s taxes. The penny spent per person on this is well worth it, in my opinion.