How about instead of paying to name a stadium or now paying legal fees to fight each other they try something novel like reducing the ridiculous fees they charge consumers. No, that is just crazy talk.
If the WF signs are not against city/state laws or ordinances – how can another property owner say what type of signage can go on property they don’t own?
Really ?? What in the World is happening to us? This sounds like an argument between 2 Teenagers at a party…
How about instead of paying to name a stadium or now paying legal fees to fight each other they try something novel like reducing the ridiculous fees they charge consumers. No, that is just crazy talk.
Considering how banks often treat their ‘customers’ they should be glad it is only a photo ‘bomb’.
So the Vikings want to pay nothing for the right, but be able to restrict what other private property owners can put on their buildings?
If the WF signs are not against city/state laws or ordinances – how can another property owner say what type of signage can go on property they don’t own?