You don’t know anything about that case. They awarded her 1 day’s worth of coffee revenue because McDonald’s was found to serve their coffee way too hot. They had paid off numerous claims for the same thing. It was so hot it could cause serious burns after being on a person’s skin for 2 seconds. Look up the pictures of her burns and say you think she was fleecing them, and that was a drink at a temperature you could put in your mouth and swallow.
But of course you won’t do that, you will just keep saying the same ignorant BS, because it sounds like a dumb case, facts don’t matter, and you go on your gut without ever looking into anything.
It’s a shame it even had to go to the MI Supreme Court, but, it’s a good sign that they threw it out. I wonder what would have happened if that happened in CA or MA. Thankfully, some courts are still reasonable.
it is unusual for ice to form in Michigan with global warming, hence the claim went forward pursuing fair share for pain and suffering incurred due to camo ice forming in path. Ice not tolerated under new admin. Scary to see a court of supremes get one right…
Three Cheers for the Michigan Supreme Court!!!
Almost as bad as the hot coffee claim with McDonalds.
This just in, Michigan Supreme Court Rules Ice is Slippery.
You don’t know anything about that case. They awarded her 1 day’s worth of coffee revenue because McDonald’s was found to serve their coffee way too hot. They had paid off numerous claims for the same thing. It was so hot it could cause serious burns after being on a person’s skin for 2 seconds. Look up the pictures of her burns and say you think she was fleecing them, and that was a drink at a temperature you could put in your mouth and swallow.
But of course you won’t do that, you will just keep saying the same ignorant BS, because it sounds like a dumb case, facts don’t matter, and you go on your gut without ever looking into anything.
It’s a shame it even had to go to the MI Supreme Court, but, it’s a good sign that they threw it out. I wonder what would have happened if that happened in CA or MA. Thankfully, some courts are still reasonable.
Thats worth $1 mill in Chicago. Even more if she is not white.
Don’t laugh I once had a broken ankle slip and fall in Chicago cost me policy limits of $1 Million.
Not laughing.
Of course Bernstein was the only dissenter
What a surprise! Richard (ambulance chaser ) Bernstein was the lone dissenter.
it is unusual for ice to form in Michigan with global warming, hence the claim went forward pursuing fair share for pain and suffering incurred due to camo ice forming in path. Ice not tolerated under new admin. Scary to see a court of supremes get one right…