National News

Lawmakers Question Arab Company Takeover of Major U.S. Ports

U.S. terms for approving an Arab company's takeover of operations at six major American ports are insufficient to guard against terrorist infiltration, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee said.

"I'm aware of the conditions and they relate entirely to how the company carries out its procedures, but it doesn't go to who they hire, or how they hire people,'' Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., told The Associated Press.

"They're better than nothing, but to me they don't address the underlying conditions, which is, how are they going to guard against things like infiltration by al-Qaida or someone else? How are they going to guard against corruption?'' King said.

He said he learned about the government's conditions for approving the sale from meetings with senior Bush administration officials.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff defended the security review of Dubai Ports World of the United Arab Emirates, the company given permission to take over the port operations. But Chertoff declined to talk about specifics of government discussions with the company, saying that information is classified.

"We make sure there are assurances in place, in general, sufficient to satisfy us that the deal is appropriate from a national security standpoint,'' Chertoff said Sunday on ABC's "This Week.''

London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., was bought last week by DP World, a state-owned business. Peninsular and Oriental runs major commercial operations in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.

Lawmakers from both parties are questioning the sale as a possible risk to national security.

"It's unbelievably tone deaf politically at this point in our history,'' Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., said on "Fox News Sunday.''

"Most Americans are scratching their heads, wondering why this company from this region now,'' Graham said.

Added Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind.: "I think we've got to look into this company. We've got to (assure) ... the American people that their national security interests are going to be protected.''

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told Arab journalists in an interview Friday at the State Department that it was "the considered opinion of the U.S. government that this can go forward.'' She pledged to work with Congress because "perhaps people will need better explanation and will need to understand some of the process that we have gone through.''

At least one Senate oversight hearing is planned for later this month.

"Congress is welcome to look at this and can get classified briefings,'' Chertoff told CNN's "Late Edition.''

"We have to balance the paramount urgency of security against the fact that we still want to have a robust global trading system,'' he added.

Sen. Robert Menendez, who is working on legislation to prohibit companies owned or controlled by foreign governments from running port operations in the U.S., said Chertoff's comments showed him that the administration "just does not get it.''

In a statement, the New Jersey Democrat said, "No matter what steps the administration claims it has secretly taken, it is an unacceptable risk to turn control of our ports over to a foreign government, particularly one with a troubling history. We cannot depend on promises a foreign government has given the administration in secret to secure our ports.''

Chertoff said Dubai Ports World should not be excluded automatically from such a deal because it is based in the UAE.

Critics have cited the UAE's history as an operational and financial base for the hijackers who carried out the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. In addition, they contend the UAE was an important transfer point for shipments of smuggled nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya by a Pakistani scientist.

Dubai Ports World has said it intends to "maintain and, where appropriate, enhance current security arrangements.'' The UAE's foreign minister has described his country as an important U.S. ally in fighting terrorism.

"I would hope that our friends in Abu Dhabi would not be offended by the fact that in our democracy, we debate these things,'' Rice said in the interview with the Arab journalists.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Ports & Bush Ned
Feb 28, 2006, 7:35 am
RE: Ports & Bush IndAgent
Feb 28, 2006, 1:23 am
RE: RE: RE: United Arab Emirates - check them out Peter Polstein
Feb 27, 2006, 4:11 pm
RE: RE: United Arab Emirates - check them out lisa
Feb 27, 2006, 3:26 pm
Ports & Bush nancy
Feb 27, 2006, 3:26 pm
RE: United Arab Emirates - check them out IndAgent
Feb 24, 2006, 11:13 pm
United Arab Emirates - check them out learning fast
Feb 24, 2006, 6:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Ports Thank you...
Feb 23, 2006, 7:47 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Ports Peter Polstein
Feb 23, 2006, 7:29 am
RE: RE: RE: Ports Ned
Feb 23, 2006, 6:59 am
RE: RE: RE: Sale of Port Operations IndAgent
Feb 22, 2006, 10:59 pm
RE: Sale of Port Operations IndAgent
Feb 22, 2006, 10:54 pm
RE: America the Sad IndAgent
Feb 22, 2006, 10:51 pm
IDIOTS Michael
Feb 22, 2006, 10:30 pm
RE: Sale of Port Operations Mark
Feb 22, 2006, 7:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Ports compman
Feb 22, 2006, 5:58 pm
RE: RE: RE: Ports LLCJ
Feb 22, 2006, 5:46 pm
RE: RE: Ports Ned, what is wrong with you?
Feb 22, 2006, 4:59 pm
RE: Sale of Port Operations What The #&*^%?!?!?
Feb 22, 2006, 4:52 pm
RE: RE: Sale of Port Operations I am shocked
Feb 22, 2006, 4:13 pm
RE: Sale of Port Operations Pud
Feb 22, 2006, 3:53 pm
Sale of Port Operations crystal
Feb 22, 2006, 3:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: Ports LLCJ
Feb 22, 2006, 3:08 pm
RE: RE: Ports A VETERAN
Feb 22, 2006, 3:07 pm
RE: Ports Ned
Feb 22, 2006, 2:40 pm
What is the big deal? So sad...
Feb 22, 2006, 2:37 pm
RE: RE: Sale of Port Operations Bush is an idiot
Feb 22, 2006, 2:36 pm
RE: America the Sad Ned
Feb 22, 2006, 2:34 pm
RE: RE: Ports Ned, what is wrong with you?
Feb 22, 2006, 2:32 pm
It doesn't make sense at all... Insurance Hustla
Feb 22, 2006, 2:29 pm
Sale of Port Operations CMERRILL
Feb 22, 2006, 2:24 pm
America the Sad Sad American
Feb 22, 2006, 2:21 pm
RE: Ports Ned
Feb 22, 2006, 2:00 pm
Ports Peter Polstein
Feb 22, 2006, 1:44 pm
RE: RE: Sale of Port Operations Are they kidding?
Feb 22, 2006, 1:42 pm
RE: RE: Sale of Port Operations LLCJ
Feb 22, 2006, 1:36 pm
RE: Sale of Port Operations IndAgent
Feb 22, 2006, 1:31 pm
RE: RE: Sale of Port Operations Roger Mount
Feb 22, 2006, 1:27 pm
Re: Sale of port operations Ed
Feb 22, 2006, 1:26 pm
RE: Sale of Port Operations Bryan
Feb 22, 2006, 1:20 pm
Just yet another chapeter Another Screwed Americans
Feb 22, 2006, 1:13 pm
RE: Sale of Port Operations compman
Feb 22, 2006, 1:06 pm
Sale of Port Operations nancy
Feb 22, 2006, 1:03 pm
Sale of Port Operations Sharon Pond
Feb 22, 2006, 1:00 pm
RE: RE: Sale of Port Operations compman
Feb 22, 2006, 12:56 pm
RE: Totally incredible Wow!
Feb 22, 2006, 12:55 pm
RE: Sale of Port Operations LLCJ
Feb 22, 2006, 12:50 pm
Sale of Port Operations Are they kidding?
Feb 22, 2006, 10:14 am
Another Political Double Standard Ray
Feb 22, 2006, 8:32 am