National News
Key Federal Katrina Ruling Favoring Homeowners Surprises Industry
January 12, 2007
In a Hurricane Katrina claims decision that surprised the insurance industry, a federal judge ruled that State Farm did not provide sufficient evidence to prove what damage to a Mississippi family's house was caused by wind versus water and the jury subsequently assessed $2.5 million in punitive damages against the insurer.
In a directed verdict, U.S. District Court Judge L.T. Senter in Broussard v. State Farm ruled that the homeowners needed to only prove a direct physical loss. He ordered State Farm to pay $223,000 in actual damages for the home and belongings of Biloxi couple Norman and Genevieve Broussard, before turning the case back to the jury to decide on the punitive damages.
State Farm and others in the insurance industry expressed surprise and concern over the ruling.
"We did not expect this decision," said Kim Brunner, general counsel for State Farm. "Testimony of expert witnesses showed that damage to the Broussard home was overwhelmingly caused by water and not wind."
After State Farm refused to pay for any damage to their demolished home after Katrina, the Broussards sued to obtain full insured value of their home plus $5 million in punitive damages. They maintained that winds from Katrina destroyed their house.
State Farm, however, denied any payment, arguing that all the damage was cussed storm surge waters.
Insurers maintain that traditional homeowner policies cover damage from wind but not from water or damage caused by a combination of both.
Senter's ruling, however, maintains that in the Broussard case the insurer failed to prove as it claimed that all of the damage to the Broussards' home was caused by storm surge. He also said the insurer failed to show how much damage was caused by wind and how much by storm surge.
"We believe that the ruling is inconsistent with the insurance contract and Mississippi law," said State Farm's Brunner.
State Farm also expressed disappointment with the jury's finding the company is liable for punitive damages in the amount of $2.5 million. The company will be evaluating its next steps with regard to this decision which will likely include an appeal.
State Farm said it has has closed 98 percent of the claims it received arising from the storm and has paid out over $1.1 billion in claims in Mississippi.
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| State Farm settled out of court Jan 19, 2007 |
HOMEOWNER Insured w/State Farm |
Jan 19, 2007, 10:02 pm |
| Stand United: Before the next Katrina |
Kim David |
Jan 19, 2007, 7:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: fair |
Chad Balaamaba |
Jan 19, 2007, 4:32 pm |
| feel felt found |
gill fin |
Jan 19, 2007, 2:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: fair |
Linda |
Jan 19, 2007, 2:10 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: fair |
chad balaamaba |
Jan 19, 2007, 11:52 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: fair |
Kat |
Jan 19, 2007, 11:27 am |
| RE: RE: RE: fair |
Chad Balaamaba |
Jan 19, 2007, 11:20 am |
| RE: RE: fair |
Linda |
Jan 19, 2007, 10:58 am |
| RE: fair |
Chad Balaamaba |
Jan 19, 2007, 10:48 am |
| fair |
ML |
Jan 19, 2007, 10:01 am |
| Chad: Was the Driver Insured by State Farm? |
State Farm A Bad Neighbor |
Jan 16, 2007, 4:09 pm |
| SF in comtempt in OK class action |
Katrina Victim |
Jan 16, 2007, 3:57 pm |
| Insurance Gridlock |
Ross Perot |
Jan 16, 2007, 11:05 am |
| Katrina Ruling |
Ray Balaamababa |
Jan 16, 2007, 10:57 am |
| This reminds me of my last visit to Wal-Mart |
Chad Balaamaba |
Jan 16, 2007, 10:50 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Wasn't On the Jury |
Jan 16, 2007, 12:52 am |
| RE: RE: RE: How much? |
Other References |
Jan 16, 2007, 12:45 am |
| RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause |
Gulf Visitor |
Jan 15, 2007, 11:29 pm |
| RE: You can't be bullies with a contract of adhesion |
Gulf Visitor |
Jan 15, 2007, 11:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Gulfport Visitor |
Jan 15, 2007, 11:06 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? |
Gulfport Visitor |
Jan 15, 2007, 11:03 pm |
| RE: RE: How much? |
Gulf Visitor |
Jan 15, 2007, 10:59 pm |
| RE: How much? |
Read Policy Language |
Jan 15, 2007, 9:48 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? |
Blame the Company |
Jan 15, 2007, 9:40 pm |
| RE: Send Them to IRAQ + Bring Our Americans Home |
Gulf Visitor |
Jan 15, 2007, 7:41 pm |
| How much? |
Gulf Visitor |
Jan 15, 2007, 7:16 pm |
| World Book Encyclopedia: Katrina worst in USA history |
State Farm Policy Holder |
Jan 15, 2007, 4:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Rick Frazier |
Jan 15, 2007, 4:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Bear Fan |
Jan 15, 2007, 4:31 pm |
| RE: RE: Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? |
Common Sense has left you??? |
Jan 15, 2007, 2:42 pm |
| RE: Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? |
Read the Article |
Jan 15, 2007, 10:55 am |
| RE: State Fm Policy: No Wind, No Water but 2 Deductibles |
fmkeller |
Jan 15, 2007, 8:01 am |
| Send Them to IRAQ + Bring Our Americans Home |
Pirates of Snake Farm |
Jan 15, 2007, 2:16 am |
| State Fm Policy: No Wind, No Water but 2 Deductibles |
State Farm Homeowner |
Jan 15, 2007, 1:58 am |
| To: KAY State Farm said... It Was All Water |
Bay St. Louis HOMEOWNER |
Jan 15, 2007, 1:20 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Kay |
Jan 14, 2007, 11:55 pm |
| Punitve Damages & Actual Damages? |
Gulf Visitor |
Jan 14, 2007, 5:11 pm |
| RE: Justice Has Been Done |
thefactsmatter |
Jan 13, 2007, 4:13 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause |
thefactsmatter |
Jan 13, 2007, 4:11 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause |
drudy |
Jan 13, 2007, 3:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause |
Four Ways Forward |
Jan 13, 2007, 2:08 pm |
| RE: Justice Has Been Done |
Rate Fixer |
Jan 13, 2007, 1:09 pm |
| Justice Has Been Done |
State Farm Policy Holder |
Jan 13, 2007, 12:13 pm |
| RE: RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause |
boonedoggle |
Jan 13, 2007, 11:58 am |
| RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause |
thefactsmatter |
Jan 13, 2007, 8:02 am |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Homeowner USA |
Jan 13, 2007, 12:42 am |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Katrina Survivor |
Jan 13, 2007, 12:32 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Punitive Damages |
Jan 12, 2007, 11:52 pm |
| RE: Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause |
Clarity Missing |
Jan 12, 2007, 11:42 pm |
| RE: Smart Insuror |
St. Fine Print |
Jan 12, 2007, 10:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Gulf visitor |
Jan 12, 2007, 9:06 pm |
| RE: Katrina ruling |
Robert T Blessing |
Jan 12, 2007, 8:13 pm |
| Katrina Ruling |
Smart Insurer |
Jan 12, 2007, 6:48 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
boonedoggle |
Jan 12, 2007, 6:29 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
Exclusivity |
Jan 12, 2007, 5:26 pm |
| Katrina Ruling |
Mike |
Jan 12, 2007, 5:12 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
dd |
Jan 12, 2007, 4:27 pm |
| Problem solved |
Linda |
Jan 12, 2007, 3:55 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
ernie |
Jan 12, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
wgw |
Jan 12, 2007, 3:37 pm |
| Coastal RE |
marty |
Jan 12, 2007, 3:34 pm |
| Coastal RE |
good point |
Jan 12, 2007, 3:24 pm |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Mark |
Jan 12, 2007, 3:07 pm |
| Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause |
Mark |
Jan 12, 2007, 2:51 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Dennis |
Jan 12, 2007, 2:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Marty |
Jan 12, 2007, 2:13 pm |
| Nationwide homeowner insurance rates. |
Rate Fixer |
Jan 12, 2007, 2:07 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling - correct to NOT need Punitive |
Rich |
Jan 12, 2007, 2:05 pm |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Rich |
Jan 12, 2007, 2:01 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
Marty |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:53 pm |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Public Adjuster |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Linda |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
NM Bill |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Public Adjuster |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:35 pm |
| You can't be bullies with a contract of adhesion |
media mogul |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:33 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
Inside Looking Out |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:31 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
Misty Meanor |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:26 pm |
| Katrina ruling |
Richard Hartzen |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:22 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
GG |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Waiting for scientific fact |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
Jeff Dixon |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:14 pm |
| Katrina ruling |
Not Surprised |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:11 pm |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
Ignorance times 12 |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:05 pm |
| Wow, another crappy story with no facts |
Smitty |
Jan 12, 2007, 1:02 pm |
| Katrina Ruling |
Public Adjuster |
Jan 12, 2007, 12:58 pm |
| RE: RE: Katrina Ruling |
M D Huntley |
Jan 12, 2007, 12:54 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
Pat |
Jan 12, 2007, 12:51 pm |
| RE: Katrina Ruling |
Melissa |
Jan 12, 2007, 12:47 pm |
| Katrina Ruling |
Florida Resident |
Jan 12, 2007, 12:37 pm |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article