What is Future of Shrinking U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission?

By Will Lester | July 30, 2007

Separate emails using a comma.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission could soon shrink to the point where it can’t effectively protect the public, veteran Commissioner Thomas Moore says.

Many employees at the agency responsible for overseeing the safety of many thousands of consumer products are looking for other jobs because “they have no confidence the agency will continue to exist — or will exist in any meaningful form,” Moore said in a statement last Thursday.

“The commission can either continue to decline in staff, resources and stature to the point where it is no longer an effective force in consumer protection,” said Moore, “or with the support of Congress it can regain the important place in American society it was originally designed to have.”

The number of full-time staffers has shrunk to about 400, less than half the size of the staff in 1980.

Complaints from business leaders about the agency created in the early 1970s resulted in the staff being sharply cut during the Reagan administration. Budget cuts or constraints since then have forced further reductions in the staff.

In 1981, the Consumer Product Safety Act was amended to limit the commission’s ability to set mandatory standards. The change required the commission to accept voluntary industry standards if it was likely they would significantly reduce risk to consumers.

The safety commission usually negotiates voluntary recalls of unsafe products because a voluntary agreement is considered a faster way to get a product off the shelves. If a company refuses to recall a product, the agency’s commission has the authority to order a recall.

But such actions can be lengthy as they work their way through the legal system. The commission can also assess civil penalties on companies for failure to report possible problems and can set product standards.

Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation to increase funding and staffing for the agency as well as enhance its powers.

“Over the course of my meetings with CPSC, I’ve been impressed with the competence and dedication of its staff,” said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill, who is co-sponsoring a bill to strengthen the agency. “I believe that CPSC needs the tools and manpower necessary to protect American consumers.”

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said: “CPSC’s budget has increased throughout the course of this administraton.”

Moore, who was appointed to the commission by President Clinton more than 12 years ago, said he was pleased that Acting Commission Chairwoman Nancy Nord, an appointee of President Bush, is also in favor of modernizing the laws relating to the commission.

“This should send a really positive message to the public and to the safety community that this is a commission that can work together,” said commission spokeswoman Julie Vallese.

The agency also has been hampered by a vacancy on its three-member commission.

With only two of three commissioners, the agency had no quorum and has been unable to make rules about product standards, mandate recalls and assess civil penalties for the last six months.

Congress could soon restore those powers to the agency for a limited time despite the commission vacancy.

Bush’s pick to head the safety commission, Michael Baroody, withdrew his nomination in May after strong opposition from some Senate Democrats because of his career as a manufacturers’ lobbyist.

___

On the Net:

Consumer Product Safety Commission: http://www.cpsc.gov

Separate emails using a comma.
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • August 2, 2007 at 8:43 am
    Al says:
    Fine. But why do I have to pay for it? And it's not all nature shows, it's mostle marxist drivel. There are hundreds of cable channels available for couch potatoes' enjoyment ... read more
  • July 31, 2007 at 5:59 am
    I like PBS says:
    They have good travel/educational programs on there. Not to mention the kid programs that are intelligent enough for adults to understand without asking the kid to explain!
  • July 31, 2007 at 9:26 am
    El Squid says:
    The auto industry did in fact offer seat belts in the 50's at very low prices. Ford Motor Company in particular promoted their sale and use. The public took this as a sign tha... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features