National News

Obama Opposes Adding Wind Coverage to Federal Flood Insurance

The Obama Administration is again opposing a move to add wind insurance to the federal flood insurance program, as has been pushed by Rep. Gene Taylor, D.-Miss.

A statement from the Office of Management and Budget says Taylor's bill, HR 1264, would unnecessarily expand the government's role into an insurance area already served by private insurers.

"Although the Administration believes in strengthening the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for the benefit of policyholders and taxpayers, the central rationale for the program – the difficulty of obtaining flood insurance through either the private market or state programs – simply does not apply to windstorm insurance in most markets," the OMB said.

OMB also said that because the legislation requires that a federal wind insurance program be actuarially sound, the insurance offered through a federal program may not be any less expensive, and could be more expensive, than what is currently offered by private insurers or by states.

"As a result, expanding NFIP to cover windstorm insurance would unnecessarily duplicate available insurance products and could 'crowd out" such products where they are offered, while offering little to no savings to the American public. At a time when the NFIP is already facing serious challenges, the Administration cannot support such an expansion."

The Obama Administration has opposed the wind insurance bill in the past as have various taxpayer, environmental and insurance groups. The measure is being reconsidered this week in Congress.

Sponsored by Van Aartrijk

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: Cassandra is not Rosie American Patriot
Jul 27, 2010, 12:46 pm
RE: RE: RE: Cassandra is not Rosie Tom
Jul 26, 2010, 10:08 am
RE: RE: Cassandra is not Rosie Cassandra
Jul 26, 2010, 9:53 am
RE: Cassandra = Rosie? Tom
Jul 26, 2010, 7:56 am
Cassandra = Rosie? Joker
Jul 23, 2010, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: Undeniable truths- Cassandra Sarah
Jul 23, 2010, 2:48 pm
RE: Undeniable truths- Tom and Sarah cassandra
Jul 23, 2010, 1:19 pm
Undeniable truths- Casandra Sarah
Jul 23, 2010, 12:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Tax Whiners Tom
Jul 23, 2010, 11:05 am
RE: RE: Tax Whiners Cassandra
Jul 23, 2010, 9:58 am
RE: Tax Whiners earlybird
Jul 23, 2010, 9:31 am
RE: RE: Tax Whiners Tom
Jul 23, 2010, 9:23 am
RE: Tax Whiners Cassandra
Jul 23, 2010, 9:04 am
RE: Wind insurance v. Health insurance Tom
Jul 23, 2010, 7:39 am
Wind insurance v. Health insurance no one at all
Jul 22, 2010, 5:59 pm
Wind Insurance Whatsup?
Jul 22, 2010, 5:15 pm
Breaking Wind Tom
Jul 22, 2010, 3:29 pm
RE: RE: Attorney's solution for insurance DM
Jul 22, 2010, 3:25 pm
RE: RE: RE: Attorney's solution for insurance
Jul 22, 2010, 3:24 pm
RE: RE: Attorney's solution for insurance An Agent from Arizona
Jul 22, 2010, 3:21 pm
RE: Attorney's solution for insurance PIP FRAUDER
Jul 22, 2010, 3:19 pm
RE: Attorney's solution for insurance John
Jul 22, 2010, 3:16 pm
Attorney's solution for insurance Pat
Jul 22, 2010, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: I don't believe my eyes Pat from Chicago (almost)
Jul 22, 2010, 3:05 pm
RE: RE: I don't believe my eyes John
Jul 22, 2010, 3:04 pm
RE: I don't believe my eyes John
Jul 22, 2010, 2:53 pm
I don't believe my eyes Bob Curtis
Jul 22, 2010, 2:25 pm
For Crist's sake Tom
Jul 22, 2010, 1:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Against Mother Earth TxLady
Jul 22, 2010, 1:51 pm
RE: RE: RE: Against Mother Earth FLagent/insured
Jul 22, 2010, 1:48 pm
RE: RE: Against Mother Earth An Agent from Arizona
Jul 22, 2010, 1:48 pm
RE: REAL REPUBLICAN Omni Sure
Jul 22, 2010, 1:46 pm
RE: RE: Against Mother Earth Omni Sure
Jul 22, 2010, 1:43 pm
RE: RE: Against Mother Earth Pat
Jul 22, 2010, 1:36 pm
RE: Against Mother Earth DM
Jul 22, 2010, 1:08 pm
Obama Woodchuck
Jul 22, 2010, 1:05 pm
Against Mother Earth Tom
Jul 22, 2010, 12:53 pm