E&O Risks When Insuring Commerical Property

By Curtis M. Pearsall | November 5, 2012

It seems that every year commercial property is one of the top three lines of business generating errors and omissions (E&O) claims against agents. Because most agents insure a fair number of commercial buildings, this is an area in which agents would be wise to dedicate time and resources, especially if they are serious about keeping an E&O claim from happening to them. Each commercial building has its own complexity and uniqueness — and failing to address this could lead to E&O issues.

Occupancy

There is a lengthy list of possible occupancies and, with the economy the way it is, vacancy is also a possibility. As a result, a personal visit by the producer, at minimum, is a must. This will enable the producer to walk through the building and ask the building owner whether there are plans for a change in the businesses occupying the building. If some areas are vacant, the producer should ascertain what percentage is vacant and what the plans are. If the building is undergoing renovations, what is the projected completion date and who will be the tenant?

When completing the application for the carrier, provide a complete, unbiased narrative with these details. Misleading the carrier just to get the account written is not suggested. For example, calling a vacant building a “dead air storage facility” (a true story!) will backfire in more ways than one.

The following claim speaks to many of the problems that can arise when the producer truly doesn’t know the account being insured:

The agency secured coverage for a building owner, who leased part of the premises to a customer. The rest of the building was vacant. A vagrant sleeping in the vacant area knocked over a candle, causing a fire. The building damages were around $1 million. Following the fire, the carrier denied coverage and started a rescission action. The carrier claimed: 1) the application stated the building was fully occupied; 2) the square footage was twice as much as was reported on the application; and 3) the application noted the building was fully renovated, when it was not. The agent knew he lied about the square footage and the vacancy issue. The demand was $500,000, with the claim against the agency settled for $210,000.

Complete the App with the Prospect

The application is designed to address all pertinent underwriting and rating issues. Because the goal is to ensure a complete, thorough application, meeting with the building owner to ask the relevant questions and accurately record the responses is suggested. Without this process, it is realistic that you may not even know the correct name of the named insured. Getting that information correct is obviously important.

Many building owners provide numerous services. Operations include rent collection, security, building maintenance, grounds keeping, accounting and advertising, to name a few. The producer should ask how these duties are performed. If the duties are contracted out, what are the insurance requirements expected of those firms? The carrier underwriter will want to know how these situations are handled.

Depending on the age of the building(s), the status of key building updates and fire protection should be well documented.

Given that there is a significant amount of information required, ensure you have recorded the details correctly by having the insured review and sign the completed application.

Is Building Ordinance or Law Coverage an Issue?

While property policies may provide some coverage for the increased cost of construction due to the enforcement of laws arising from a covered loss, coverage is typically limited in both scope and available limit. Broadening the coverage would require an endorsement. The additional coverage usually includes: 1) a limit for the value of the undamaged part of the building when a building code requires its demolition after a partial loss; 2) coverage for the expenses associated with the demolition of the undamaged property; and 3) coverage for the increased cost of the construction due to the building codes.

Bottom line, the costs for these areas could be substantial.

Other Property issues

Boiler and Machinery/Equipment Breakdown: This is an area often overlooked, yet it has the potential to cause significant property damage in the event of an explosion, electrical surge or other equipment-related losses not covered by the standard property forms.

Time Element : If there is a loss, the building owner would have a loss-of-rents exposure and could incur extra expenses. Tenants Move Back Insurance provides coverage for a tenant who was forced to move out after a loss and is now looking to move back in.

Earthquake/Flood: Losses from these types of perils can be significant. Does your client have this coverage now? It is recommended that you discuss these exposures and provide your client with a proposal.

Exposure Analysis Approach

The above are just some of the exposures building owners have. The potential list of exposures is lengthy, so the efficient use of an exposure analysis checklist is a great way to ensure that the exposures have been identified and the necessary questions asked and answered.

Most agencies insure a building owner of some type. Because no two risks look the same, agents should have a detailed approach and process to ensure the information presented to the carrier is current and correct. This is the best way to minimize the potential of your agency facing some type of errors and omissions litigation.

Pearsall, CPCU, ARM, is president of Pearsall Associates Inc., a risk management consulting firm specializing helping agents protect themselves. He is also a special consultant to the Utica National Agents E&O program. Phone: 315-768- 1534. E-mail: curtis@pearsallassociates.com. Blog: www.agentseotips.com.

 

image of Curtis M. Pearsall

About Curtis M. Pearsall

Pearsall is president of Pearsall Associates Inc., a risk management consulting firm. He is also a special consultant to the Utica National Agents E&O program. Phone: 315-768- 1534. Email: curtis@pearsallassociates.com. More from Curtis M. Pearsall
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • November 6, 2012 at 12:43 pm
    Company says:
    Very very few agents handle commercial buildings in this fashion. I think it is a terrific outline of the risk management and front line underwritering that should occur wit... read more
  • November 5, 2012 at 3:25 pm
    ExciteBiker says:
    This is a good article. I would add insurance to value to the list. Is the limit of insurance sufficient to rebuild or satisfy any coinsurance provisions which may apply?
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features