House Lawmakers Introduce Patent Reform Bill

July 23, 2013

Two U.S. lawmakers introduced legislation on Monday to give companies another tool to fight lawsuits brought by companies that specialize in patent litigation.

Their bill would broaden the power of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to review patents and verify that they should have been granted.

Currently, the patent office can review business method patents related to financial services more aggressively than other patents.

The bill – proposed by California Representatives Darrell Issa, a Republican, and Judy Chu, a Democrat – would expand that authority to include all business method patents, many of which are software patents that are frequently used by firms, often derided as “patent trolls,” to file infringement lawsuits.

The bill is similar to one introduced in May by Senator Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat. Action has not yet been taken on Schumer’s bill.

Cisco Systems Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc. and other technology powerhouses have been pushing for legislation that would reduce the number of times each year that they are sued for infringement by a “non-practicing entity,” a company that licenses patents as its business. Google has estimated the cost of such litigation to the U.S. economy at $30 billion a year.

The White House in June urged Congress to take steps to curb lawsuits by firms that make or sell nothing but specialize in suing others for patent infringement, and there are other proposals circulating on Capitol Hill.

Senator Patrick Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont, and Representative Bob Goodlatte, a Republican from Virginia, have released a discussion draft of a bill aimed at stopping frivolous patent litigation.

And Representative Peter DeFazio, an Oregon Democrat, has introduced legislation aimed at hurting so-called trolls by allowing judges to force such firms to pay the legal fees of companies they unsuccessfully sue.

 

 

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • July 25, 2013 at 5:33 pm
    Rick says:
    What's the definition of 'frivilous'? When an 800lb gorilla willfully tramples on an small inventors government issued patent and partners with a deep pocket investor/troll to... read more
  • July 24, 2013 at 12:15 pm
    staff says:
    Issa and Chu are severely duped or severely bought. “patent troll” infringers and their paid puppets’ definition of ‘patent troll’: anyone who has the nerve to sue u... read more
  • July 24, 2013 at 9:42 am
    Roland says:
    "Their bill would broaden the power of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office..." Of course, the politicians' solution when government fails is always to expand government. Ther... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features