U.S. to Mandate Tests of Oil Being Transported by Train

By Patrick Rucker | February 26, 2014

Federal regulators issued an emergency order on Tuesday requiring oil from North Dakota being loaded onto trains to be tested and properly labeled to reflect its volatile nature after a series of explosive train derailments over the past year.

U.S. Department of Transportation warned last month that fuel produced out of the North Dakota’s Bakken region could be more flammable and explosion-prone than previously thought.

“If you intend to move crude oil by rail, then you must test and classify the material appropriately,” Department of Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement.

Hazardous material rules still permit any crude oil to be carried on older DOT-111 tank cars that make up the majority of the crude-by-rail fleet. Regulators say that older DOT-111s, which have been involved in recent derailments, are prone to puncture during accidents.

Officials have acknowledged that improvements are needed to the national tank car fleet and they are considering new safety standards, but improved tank car standards were not addressed in Tuesday’s order.

The order states that all crude oil shipments must be labeled in Packing Group 1 or 2, not the less strict Group 3, the DOT said.

On Wednesday, DOT officials will join oil and rail executives at a Congressional hearing to discuss safe shipments, following accidents including a derailment in July in the Canadian town of Lac Megantic that killed 47. That mishap and two more fiery derailments of oil-by-rail from the Bakken have sparked more regulatory scrutiny.

Following the Canadian rail disaster, the DOT began an operation it dubbed “Bakken Blitz,” which includes spot inspection of oil shipments aboard trains in North Dakota.

Earlier this month, the DOT said it had fined three oil companies for wrongly classifying crude shipments from the Bakken.

While shippers have always been required to attest to their cargo, industry officials have said testing of Bakken crude has been lax. U.S. refiners have raised issues about the sampling of crude oil being delivered from the Bakken.

Phillips 66, the nation’s third-largest refiner that moves inland crude via rail to its New Jersey refinery and aims to do the same at its Washington state refinery late this year, said the company already labels all crude shipments as Packing Group 1, the designation for the most dangerous cargoes.

Also, all crude tank cars bound for Phillips 66 plants are inspected at each loading and unloading facility to ensure compliant shipments, spokeswoman Monica Silva said.

 

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • March 3, 2014 at 5:44 pm
    JJB says:
    There is NO difference. GIVING the fossil fuel industry $7,000,000,000 in annual tax breaks = the US taxpayers GIVING the fossil fuel industy $7,000,000,000. There is no diffe... read more
  • March 3, 2014 at 4:27 pm
    Perplexed says:
    I not only support removing those subsidies, but also those to the ethanol, wind, solar, and biofuels sectors. Let them compete fairly in the market on their own merits, rath... read more
  • February 28, 2014 at 10:30 am
    Libby says:
    It's the same difference as far as I'm concerned. If they don't have to pay it in taxes, it's the same as a check. And it's we, the taxpayers, that pick up the slack.
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features