The Hartford Signs Major League Baseball Contract

June 2, 2015

  • June 2, 2015 at 1:17 pm
    Mike Mansel says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 25
    Thumb down 12

    Hartford would be well advised to concentrate on insurance and not in mucking about with baseball; a children’s game. Putting the money into service and claim handling would have been a better choice.

    • June 2, 2015 at 3:09 pm
      Agent says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 23
      Thumb down 6

      Wasn’t this the same company that had to be bailed out during the financial crisis for dealing with sub prime loans? I guess they recovered with their bailout money.

      • June 2, 2015 at 3:11 pm
        Former Status Quo says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 5
        Thumb down 0

        Correction – they paid back their bailout money. Also a totally different company now – no more S&L and they pretty much sold off most of their annuity business.

        • June 2, 2015 at 5:37 pm
          Agent says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 13
          Thumb down 5

          Gee, I wonder why they sold off their financial services business. Possibly to avoid getting caught again with dirty business?

          • June 2, 2015 at 7:21 pm
            FDT says:
            Hot debate. What do you think?
            Thumb up 13
            Thumb down 20

            Sounds like sour grapes, “Agent”. The Hartford is on sound footing with a promising future in the P&C arena. Get a clue.

          • June 10, 2015 at 7:28 pm
            Insurance Girl says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 0

            Sounds like an agent who maybe Hartford terminated?? Hartford paid back ALL the bailout money, and is a very strong company.

  • June 2, 2015 at 1:57 pm
    Jack Kanauph says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 17
    Thumb down 0

    I can see this. Baseball is such a slow moving sport. Getting quotes will give the viewers something to do between pitches.

  • June 2, 2015 at 3:12 pm
    knowall says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 14
    Thumb down 0

    Quote and bind before the 7th inning stretch and you get an additional 5% discount; and a free hot dog voucher for the next game you attend lol

  • June 2, 2015 at 4:30 pm
    wayne smith says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 0

    Sorry employees of the company. Rather than pay you in profit sharing and better salaries and benefits, we’d rather have our name on some stadiums and advertisements for baseball. A waste of money.

    “Hey Edna, we need to buy our policy from this company because I saw them at the ballgame.”

    • June 2, 2015 at 5:38 pm
      Agent says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 13
      Thumb down 0

      Wayne, there goes the contingency to the agents for selling their policies. Eaten up with this contract.

  • June 3, 2015 at 9:07 am
    Jack Kanauph says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 16
    Thumb down 0

    I think some of Hartford’s decision is probably ego driven, then justified by calling it branding and name recognition. We struggle with this at a local level. Should we buy a sign on the home run fence for the high school team, or a banner in the gym. It would go to name recognition as a business reason, and the owner’s ego when he/she attends the games.
    But I don’t think I ever purchased insurance or a car because I saw their name at a sporting event. Now, I have tried a brand of liquor or beer advertised at a sporting event, but that was for immediate gratification purposes.

  • June 3, 2015 at 9:38 am
    louie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 5
    Thumb down 0

    i wouldn’t bother putting up a sign at Citzens’ Bank Park in Philly…nobody will see it.

    They did win last night, though, snapping an 8 game losing streak. Go Phils!

  • June 3, 2015 at 10:20 am
    Rumba says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 1

    This company continues to re-invent itself. Personal Lines struggles in the independent agency space due to the AARP centric relationship since 1984. Approximately 80% of the carrier’s Personal Lines business is AARP affinity driven. Small commercial P&C is a shining light. This National carrier is challenged in the market due to the strong and successful regional & super regional carriers that are close to their agents and customers. Note the recent 2015 IIABA Marketshare Report specific to National carriers especially personal lines. Hartford is sending a national branding message and MLB may be the ticket. Maybe a home run. Maybe a strike out.

  • June 3, 2015 at 10:59 am
    knowall says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 8
    Thumb down 0

    When it comes to insurance WE will never throw you a curve ball……..

    • June 3, 2015 at 11:47 am
      Agent says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 15
      Thumb down 0

      How about a “spitter”,ie AARP program bypassing agents.

      • June 8, 2015 at 10:44 am
        been there says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 8
        Thumb down 0

        More than you know. The latest with Hartfraud is where they are terminating low producing agents. The difference in their “termination” is that they are keeping the policies and allowing them to renew directly with Hartford while cutting out the agent. How nice! Sorry a majority of my book doesn’t qualify for AARP. I do all the work and then you cut me out. Awesome! Just like some records in baseball, Hartford’s numbers should have an asterisk!

        • June 8, 2015 at 12:03 pm
          Agent says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 9
          Thumb down 0

          been there, our agency made the mistake of appointing with Hartford many years ago. We quickly found out how hard it was to sell their Personal Lines since they were almost always higher than our other 4 markets. They made no changes to get more competitive so we said bye bye to them and acquired another market who was interested in writing and retaining good business.

        • June 8, 2015 at 2:49 pm
          SWFL Agent says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 1
          Thumb down 0

          Sounds like the Hartford Producer’s Agreement needs to reviewed thoroughly.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*