Jury: Costco Should Pay $5.5 Million Plus Damages for Selling Fake Tiffany Rings

By | October 3, 2016

Costco Wholesale Corp. should hand over $5.5 million to compensate Tiffany & Co. for selling counterfeit Tiffany diamond engagement rings, a federal jury said on Thursday.

Tiffany is also entitled to punitive damages, the jury in Manhattan said. Lawyers for both sides were presenting evidence on Friday to help determine the amount of punitive damages.

The trial, which began on Sept. 20, was aimed at determining the amount in total damages that Costco is liable for, after U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain ruled last year that Costco had willfully infringed Tiffany’s trademark by selling rings bearing the luxury retailer’s name.

Tiffany spokesman Nathan Strauss declined to comment on Friday. In a statement on its website, Costco said it would not comment because jury deliberations were continuing.

The $5.5 million represents the amount of profit Costco made from the sale of the rings that would fairly compensate Tiffany, said the jury, which was made up of five men and two women.

The amount far exceeds the $781,000 that Costco had argued at the start of the trial was the maximum it owed. Costco said about 2,500 rings it sold were found by the court to have infringed Tiffany’s trademark.

Costco had also argued that Tiffany’s trademarks were invalid because they sought to prevent others from using the word “Tiffany” as a generic description of a type of ring setting.

But Swain rejected that argument and said Costco confused consumers by using the word Tiffany in display case signs.

She said Costco’s jewelry buyers had asked vendors to copy Tiffany designs, and that evidence showed Costco employees were aware of customer confusion but did nothing to remedy it.

The case is Tiffany & Company and Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. Costco Wholesale Corp., U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 13-1041.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Additional reporting by Nate Raymond; Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Bernadette Baum)

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • October 4, 2016 at 6:31 pm
    costcarl says:
    As a former employee, I can tell you that it's all pretty much b.s., but they disguise it well. Are they better than Wal-Mart? Sure. But that bar is so low, ants couldn't limb... read more
  • October 3, 2016 at 6:21 pm
    integrity matters says:
    Nancy, I totally agree. Tiffany did not actually "lose" anything from a monetary standpoint. It was their "brand" that was stolen. The real losers (not picking on people that ... read more
  • October 3, 2016 at 5:52 pm
    Nancy says:
    Don't know how Costco worded it, but if they had said "tiffany style" ring meaning a ring with a single round diamond in a prong setting, that may have worked and would have a... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (6)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features