“which was negotiated by the Obama Administration in talks that began in 2015…”
Uh-oh, what are the Trumpflakes going to do? Support this Obama-driven and negotiated initiative or not? No worries Trumpflakes, just like everything else he never actually accomplished, Dear Leader will take credit for it and then you can support it.
Intelligent people review the details. What do believe is the likely impact of dropping collateral requirements on Lloyds’ Syndicates (among other insurers) on US risks? Ready, steady, … GO!
Oh, come on kid. Nat/Bear said he liked some aspects of it and disagreed with others, so I politely asked which parts he was talking about. Can you stop trolling for just one article? Please?
Oh come on kid, every post you make is one of asking questions, no matter what the subject is. Do you never know anything about a subject when you come on this blog? We answer you and you keep asking questions over and over and try to word parse us to death.
July 24, 2017 at 3:45 pm
Rosenblatt says:
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I still hope NatBear can expand on his post and tell us what parts he agrees & disagrees with. Nice continued attempt at continued trolling, though!
“which was negotiated by the Obama Administration in talks that began in 2015…”
Uh-oh, what are the Trumpflakes going to do? Support this Obama-driven and negotiated initiative or not? No worries Trumpflakes, just like everything else he never actually accomplished, Dear Leader will take credit for it and then you can support it.
Intelligent people review the details. What do believe is the likely impact of dropping collateral requirements on Lloyds’ Syndicates (among other insurers) on US risks? Ready, steady, … GO!
I support most of the provisions, and those with which I disagree are fairly insignificant relative to the overall benefits that it will yield.
Can you please tell us specifically which parts you support and which ones you disagree with?
Rosenblatt, do your own research and let us know what you think. Then, we can word parse your posts.
Oh, come on kid. Nat/Bear said he liked some aspects of it and disagreed with others, so I politely asked which parts he was talking about. Can you stop trolling for just one article? Please?
Oh come on kid, every post you make is one of asking questions, no matter what the subject is. Do you never know anything about a subject when you come on this blog? We answer you and you keep asking questions over and over and try to word parse us to death.
I still hope NatBear can expand on his post and tell us what parts he agrees & disagrees with. Nice continued attempt at continued trolling, though!