Texas Tornadoes Trigger Closer Look at Building Construction, Codes

By Steve Thompson and The Dallas Morning News | February 24, 2016

  • February 24, 2016 at 1:44 pm
    David Burns says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    Promotion of Monolithic Dome buildings should be a priority. Very similar cost, unusual looking, substantial energy savings, and withstand 400 MPH winds. I don’t understand building anything else in these wind and fire prone areas.

  • February 25, 2016 at 10:16 am
    Jean SmilingCoyote says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I second David Burns’ boosting of Monolithic Dome construction. For rectangular type buildings, there are 2 other types of reinforced concrete construction I recommend: Insulating Concrete Forms, and Dukane Double-Wall Precast. FEMA 320 urges every home and small business in the DFW area have a “safe room.” Properly built reinforced concrete – which should include horizontal members overhead (ceiling) – will take an EF3 tornado. Frame with Strong-Ties or other approved “hurricane clips” will only take an EF2 tornado. If the building design uses a simple structural plan minimizing corners, using standard size components wherever possible, and modest choices for surface treatments and built-ins, proper tornado-resistant construction including a “safe room” and an EF3-resistant building envelope, is feasible. Not included in most cost comparisons is the price of replacing all the personal property lost when a house is destroyed. EFTornadoSafeHome.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*