Southeast News
Miss. Commissioner, AG Upset Over State Farm Cutback
February 15, 2007
Mississippi officials are concerned about the effect State Farm's decision to curtail its insurance writings will have on rebuilding efforts and remaining insurance markets.
State Farm, Mississippi's largest insurer, announced this week that it will stop writing new homeowners and commercial property insurance throughout Mississippi.
State Farm Senior Vice President Bob Trippel advised Mississippi Commissioner of Insurance George Dale of the plans on Monday. "We came to this decision reluctantly. But it is no longer prudent for us to take on additional risk in a legal and business environment that is becoming more unpredictable. When there's more certainty, we will reassess the situation," said Trippel.
State Farm cited legal problems as one of the reasons for its decision. The company is concerned that its insurance policies are being reinterpreted after the fact to provide for coverages that were not contemplated when the policies were written.
The insurer was recently assessed $1 million in punitive damages (reduced from a $2.5 million jury award) in a case involving its handling of a Hurricane Katrina claim for the Broussard family. The federal judge in that case has said he would consider whether this ruling should open the door for a class action by other State Farm policyholders.
Also, in separate settlements last month, State Farm agreed to pay about $80 million to end lawsuits filed by 640 policyholders and to pay an additional $50 million to reconsider claims of up to 35,000 additional policyholders. Some details of these settlements are still being worked out.
Dale said the State Farm decision confirmed one of his fears.
"This has been a concern of mine since the day Katrina made landfall," Dale said. "State Farm's decision is a stark reminder that the issues brought about by Hurricane Katrina affect not only the coast, but policyholders all across the state.
"I regret that State Farm has chosen to make this decision at a time in the state's Hurricane Katrina recovery process when it is becoming more vital than ever that policyholders in Mississippi have a viable and affordable insurance market."
Dale, who recently announced he will run for reelection, said he is hopeful that State Farm will reverse its decision "some time in the future."
The elected commissioner also urged state lawmakers to act now to fix the state's wind pool in order to keep other insurers from leaving because of its rising assessments. "State Farm's actions clearly illustrate the importance of passing the wind pool legislation I sent to the Legislature in order to help stabilize a volatile insurance market and prevent other companies from making similar decisions," Dale said.
The State Farm decision also did not sit well with another of the state's politicians who has been heavily involved in helping Katrina claimants.
State Attorney General Jim Hood blasted State Farm, maintaining that by delaying legal proceedings and not paying settlements in a timely manner, the insurer created and profited from the very legal environment it now seeks to escape.
"They're trying to nickel and dime the state judge now," Hood said in reference to the Broussard ruling. "Two million dollars to a company that makes $3.9 billion in a year is nothing."
Hood said one of the main reasons for reaching a settlement over other State Farm claims was to keep the insurer in Mississippi, "because they have 25 percent of the insurance market on our coast." He said he had hoped that the settlement would help to stabilize the market and provide a shot in the arm for rebuilding efforts.
"They (State Farm) have been dragging this out for 15 months - more than that - and hoping people will just go away," Hood said. "I'm disappointed but not surprised."
According to Hood, State Farm "oversold itself on the coast" and couldn't pay claims based on the rates it charged. He reeled at the earnings he said State Farm reported for 2005. "It's unfortunate that in the most catastrophic year in U.S. history, they increased their profits by $3.9 billion up to a net worth of over $50 billion - unbelievable!" Hood said.
Hood likened the situation to "being in a death roll with an alligator" and said he hopes it leads to federal indictments and "true national insurance reform."
State Farm currently insures 30.3 percent of the homeowners market in Mississippi (according to 2005 data from A.M. Best). The company actually grew its business in Mississippi in 2006, writing over 29,000 new homeowners policies and more than 76,000 new auto policies.
"We will continue to serve our existing policyholders, write new auto insurance policies and market our financial services products as long as market conditions allow, but the current legal and business environments with regard to homeowners and commercial insurance are becoming untenable," Trippel said.
In the Broussard case, State Farm denied the family's claim by insisting that all the damage was caused by storm surge. State Farm has said its homeowner policies cover damage from wind but not from water, and that the policies exclude damage that could have been caused by a combination of both, even if hurricane-force winds preceded a storm's rising water.
However, the judge ruled that State Farm couldn't prove that Katrina's storm surge was responsible for all of the damage to the Broussards' home. The judge also said the testimony failed to establish how much damage was caused by wind and how much resulted from storm surge.
In an interview with Insurance Journal, State Farm spokesman Fraser Engerman defended the insurer's claims handling. "We have honored the terms of the contract and we're proud of our commitment. We put over $1 billion back into the state," he said.
Engerman said the company did make a profit in 2005. "That shows that we are financially strong and that is good for our customers," he maintained. "A company that is financially and fiscally strong is a company that is looking out for the policyholders."
Sources: State Farm
Mississippi Attorney General
Mississippi Insurance Department
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| I care |
??? |
May 9, 2007, 3:57 pm |
| RE: RE: No More |
Bubba |
May 9, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| RE: No More |
History |
May 9, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: History |
Bubba |
May 9, 2007, 2:51 pm |
| RE: No More |
Bubba |
May 9, 2007, 2:28 pm |
| No More |
The one who cares |
May 9, 2007, 12:57 pm |
| RE: RE: History |
Melanie |
May 9, 2007, 12:34 pm |
| RE: History |
Bubba |
May 1, 2007, 9:11 pm |
| History |
Fraud is the name |
May 1, 2007, 6:44 pm |
| ??? |
History |
May 1, 2007, 6:42 pm |
| Fraud?? |
melanie |
May 1, 2007, 6:40 pm |
| RE: Fraud definition and conviction |
Bingo |
May 1, 2007, 6:34 pm |
| Fraud definition and conviction |
|
May 1, 2007, 2:22 pm |
| committed |
lots of |
May 1, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| RE: RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insura |
Mjolnir |
Apr 30, 2007, 2:21 pm |
| RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance. |
Hal |
Apr 30, 2007, 8:46 am |
| A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance... |
Mjolnir |
Apr 30, 2007, 8:14 am |
| @ |
pip cases ethics |
Apr 29, 2007, 2:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws |
Bubba |
Apr 28, 2007, 9:34 pm |
| RE: RE: number? Sold Out we need laws |
Justice |
Apr 28, 2007, 9:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws |
Care |
Apr 28, 2007, 9:21 pm |
| RE: Wrong number? |
Results |
Apr 28, 2007, 9:12 pm |
| RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws |
Sold Out |
Apr 28, 2007, 9:10 pm |
| Wrong number? |
Bubba |
Apr 28, 2007, 8:54 pm |
| RE: read!! remmber and thank you |
big wrong |
Apr 28, 2007, 8:35 pm |
| read!! remmber and thank you |
Hope |
Apr 28, 2007, 8:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you |
Faith |
Apr 25, 2007, 11:21 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you |
Hal |
Apr 24, 2007, 9:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you no law |
State farm has no bars |
Apr 23, 2007, 9:47 pm |
| RE: RE: remmber and thank you |
no more |
Apr 23, 2007, 8:38 am |
| RE: remmber |
ed ivan is that really you? |
Apr 23, 2007, 8:32 am |
| You Don't KNOW or won't tell me? |
Hal |
Apr 22, 2007, 10:07 pm |
| RE: RE: WHY not answer my question? |
Faith |
Apr 22, 2007, 8:20 pm |
| RE: WHY not answer my question? |
History |
Apr 22, 2007, 8:10 pm |
| WHY not answer my question? |
Hal |
Apr 22, 2007, 6:00 pm |
| RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT |
a -Z CARES |
Apr 22, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP |
THE REAL US |
Apr 22, 2007, 3:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP |
SO VERY WRONG |
Apr 22, 2007, 3:01 pm |
| RE: RE: State of Confusion |
TELL ME ABOUT THE LAW OF THE L |
Apr 22, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| RE: State of Confusion |
Real stuff |
Apr 22, 2007, 9:59 am |
| State of Confusion |
Hal |
Apr 19, 2007, 11:42 am |
| RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT |
stand up .or wake up.CARE |
Apr 19, 2007, 10:04 am |
| RE: sTATE OF WHAT |
Hal |
Mar 19, 2007, 8:40 am |
| sTATE OF WHAT |
MELANIE |
Mar 18, 2007, 7:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
Hal |
Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm |
| RE: tree sap transfer |
hAL |
Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
hAL |
Mar 18, 2007, 6:10 pm |
| cALL THE ? WHO |
HOPE |
Mar 18, 2007, 5:31 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... |
real / CLASS |
Mar 18, 2007, 5:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... |
Neighbor |
Mar 18, 2007, 4:19 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: SF ... |
care |
Mar 18, 2007, 4:13 pm |
| RE: RE: SF ... |
SoWhat |
Mar 18, 2007, 9:35 am |
| RE: SF ... |
mad |
Mar 17, 2007, 6:36 pm |
| tree sap transfer-MORE_+ |
melanie |
Mar 15, 2007, 10:29 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
Dail |
Feb 27, 2007, 9:46 am |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
ED |
Feb 27, 2007, 9:37 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
Ged |
Feb 27, 2007, 9:31 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
Muck |
Feb 27, 2007, 9:19 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope- |
Jack Stampliker |
Feb 27, 2007, 9:07 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Fait |
Jack Stampliker |
Feb 27, 2007, 9:06 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
Sap |
Feb 27, 2007, 9:05 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
Faith |
Feb 27, 2007, 9:02 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith |
Melanie |
Feb 27, 2007, 8:56 am |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith |
melanie |
Feb 27, 2007, 8:49 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith |
Hal |
Feb 27, 2007, 8:40 am |
| RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith |
mon (CODE)??/// |
Feb 27, 2007, 8:24 am |
| tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith |
Ramondo Balaamababa |
Feb 26, 2007, 11:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
Ann |
Feb 25, 2007, 2:27 pm |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer |
Hope- Faith |
Feb 24, 2007, 11:47 am |
| RE: I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. |
Melanie |
Feb 24, 2007, 11:29 am |
| To: GED Imposter (Kim David) |
The Original GED |
Feb 23, 2007, 8:20 am |
| RE: tree sap transfer |
The Sap. |
Feb 22, 2007, 12:29 pm |
| RE: tree sap transfer |
GED |
Feb 22, 2007, 11:15 am |
| tree sap transfer |
Gill Fin |
Feb 19, 2007, 4:59 pm |
| Katrina nutrition information |
chad balaamaba |
Feb 19, 2007, 1:41 pm |
| Melanie |
Ramondo Balaamaba |
Feb 19, 2007, 1:28 pm |
| RE: Reality of the situation |
william |
Feb 19, 2007, 6:35 am |
| Case in point |
Melanie |
Feb 18, 2007, 11:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Reality of the situation |
Melanie |
Feb 18, 2007, 12:15 pm |
| RE: RE: Reality of the situation |
Mjolnir |
Feb 18, 2007, 9:32 am |
| Claims adjustors |
Hal |
Feb 17, 2007, 3:19 pm |
| RE: Reality of the situation |
Melanie |
Feb 17, 2007, 11:23 am |
| RE: Reality of the situation |
Melanie |
Feb 17, 2007, 10:39 am |
| Reality of the situation |
Mike |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:05 pm |
| know better |
Hal |
Feb 16, 2007, 6:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 AL |
rules |
Feb 16, 2007, 4:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL |
Hal |
Feb 16, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL |
Fred |
Feb 16, 2007, 2:34 pm |
| I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. |
Ralph Balamabama |
Feb 16, 2007, 2:09 pm |
| Lawyers needed to write |
Hal |
Feb 16, 2007, 1:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. |
GED |
Feb 16, 2007, 1:43 pm |
| RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL |
johnny b. |
Feb 16, 2007, 1:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Lost |
Fred |
Feb 16, 2007, 1:09 pm |
| RE: Lost in the hysteria.. |
Okay you win |
Feb 16, 2007, 12:12 pm |
| RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. |
It,s Me Again |
Feb 16, 2007, 12:09 pm |
| RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. |
Melanie |
Feb 16, 2007, 12:03 pm |
| RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. |
Jeff |
Feb 16, 2007, 12:00 pm |
| Lost in the hysteria.. |
Mjolnir |
Feb 16, 2007, 11:47 am |
| Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. |
Mjolnir |
Feb 16, 2007, 11:44 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS |
Melanie |
Feb 16, 2007, 11:41 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS |
Melanie |
Feb 16, 2007, 11:34 am |
| RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS |
Ralph Balamabama |
Feb 16, 2007, 11:16 am |
| RE: Hey Ralph |
Mel |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:57 am |
| Hey Ralph |
Hal |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:53 am |
| RE: Ms. Hodges... |
Melanie |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:34 am |
| RE: RE: Money's not the only thing.... |
Melanie |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:29 am |
| RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL |
Melanie |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:24 am |
| RE: Money's not the only thing.... |
Melanie |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:19 am |
| RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS |
Jeff |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:15 am |
| RE: We don't need no stinkin' contracts! |
Jeff |
Feb 16, 2007, 10:03 am |
| Attorney General Send In The Troops...Attack! |
Sick of Insurance |
Feb 15, 2007, 10:11 pm |
| LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL |
Insured by State Farm |
Feb 15, 2007, 7:05 pm |
| RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS |
Duke |
Feb 15, 2007, 6:03 pm |
| Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS |
Ralph Balamabama |
Feb 15, 2007, 5:31 pm |
| We don't need no stinkin' contracts! |
Chad Balaamaba |
Feb 15, 2007, 4:44 pm |
| RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! |
jim |
Feb 15, 2007, 4:36 pm |
| Stinking Contracts |
Contract Reader |
Feb 15, 2007, 3:55 pm |
| I wonder |
Dan |
Feb 15, 2007, 3:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! |
DDT |
Feb 15, 2007, 3:17 pm |
| RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! |
Fred |
Feb 15, 2007, 3:00 pm |
| Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! |
WHITE BUDDHA |
Feb 15, 2007, 2:45 pm |
| Money's not the only thing.... |
Mjolnir |
Feb 15, 2007, 2:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? |
Fred |
Feb 15, 2007, 1:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? |
Melanie |
Feb 15, 2007, 1:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? |
joe |
Feb 15, 2007, 1:16 pm |
| RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? |
Melanie |
Feb 15, 2007, 1:11 pm |
| Small insurors need customers too |
Hal |
Feb 15, 2007, 1:08 pm |
| Ms. Hodges... |
DDT |
Feb 15, 2007, 1:04 pm |
| RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? |
Realist |
Feb 15, 2007, 12:54 pm |
| RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? |
Melanie Hodges |
Feb 15, 2007, 12:48 pm |
| What did the gulf states expect to happen? |
Mjolnir |
Feb 15, 2007, 9:55 am |
| Commissioners are funny |
Hal |
Feb 15, 2007, 8:49 am |
| SF ... |
William |
Feb 15, 2007, 7:07 am |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article