Southeast News

Miss. Commissioner, AG Upset Over State Farm Cutback

Mississippi officials are concerned about the effect State Farm's decision to curtail its insurance writings will have on rebuilding efforts and remaining insurance markets.

State Farm, Mississippi's largest insurer, announced this week that it will stop writing new homeowners and commercial property insurance throughout Mississippi.

State Farm Senior Vice President Bob Trippel advised Mississippi Commissioner of Insurance George Dale of the plans on Monday. "We came to this decision reluctantly. But it is no longer prudent for us to take on additional risk in a legal and business environment that is becoming more unpredictable. When there's more certainty, we will reassess the situation," said Trippel.

State Farm cited legal problems as one of the reasons for its decision. The company is concerned that its insurance policies are being reinterpreted after the fact to provide for coverages that were not contemplated when the policies were written.

The insurer was recently assessed $1 million in punitive damages (reduced from a $2.5 million jury award) in a case involving its handling of a Hurricane Katrina claim for the Broussard family. The federal judge in that case has said he would consider whether this ruling should open the door for a class action by other State Farm policyholders.

Also, in separate settlements last month, State Farm agreed to pay about $80 million to end lawsuits filed by 640 policyholders and to pay an additional $50 million to reconsider claims of up to 35,000 additional policyholders. Some details of these settlements are still being worked out.

Dale said the State Farm decision confirmed one of his fears.

"This has been a concern of mine since the day Katrina made landfall," Dale said. "State Farm's decision is a stark reminder that the issues brought about by Hurricane Katrina affect not only the coast, but policyholders all across the state.

"I regret that State Farm has chosen to make this decision at a time in the state's Hurricane Katrina recovery process when it is becoming more vital than ever that policyholders in Mississippi have a viable and affordable insurance market."

Dale, who recently announced he will run for reelection, said he is hopeful that State Farm will reverse its decision "some time in the future."

The elected commissioner also urged state lawmakers to act now to fix the state's wind pool in order to keep other insurers from leaving because of its rising assessments. "State Farm's actions clearly illustrate the importance of passing the wind pool legislation I sent to the Legislature in order to help stabilize a volatile insurance market and prevent other companies from making similar decisions," Dale said.

The State Farm decision also did not sit well with another of the state's politicians who has been heavily involved in helping Katrina claimants.

State Attorney General Jim Hood blasted State Farm, maintaining that by delaying legal proceedings and not paying settlements in a timely manner, the insurer created and profited from the very legal environment it now seeks to escape.

"They're trying to nickel and dime the state judge now," Hood said in reference to the Broussard ruling. "Two million dollars to a company that makes $3.9 billion in a year is nothing."

Hood said one of the main reasons for reaching a settlement over other State Farm claims was to keep the insurer in Mississippi, "because they have 25 percent of the insurance market on our coast." He said he had hoped that the settlement would help to stabilize the market and provide a shot in the arm for rebuilding efforts.

"They (State Farm) have been dragging this out for 15 months - more than that - and hoping people will just go away," Hood said. "I'm disappointed but not surprised."

According to Hood, State Farm "oversold itself on the coast" and couldn't pay claims based on the rates it charged. He reeled at the earnings he said State Farm reported for 2005. "It's unfortunate that in the most catastrophic year in U.S. history, they increased their profits by $3.9 billion up to a net worth of over $50 billion - unbelievable!" Hood said.

Hood likened the situation to "being in a death roll with an alligator" and said he hopes it leads to federal indictments and "true national insurance reform."

State Farm currently insures 30.3 percent of the homeowners market in Mississippi (according to 2005 data from A.M. Best). The company actually grew its business in Mississippi in 2006, writing over 29,000 new homeowners policies and more than 76,000 new auto policies.

"We will continue to serve our existing policyholders, write new auto insurance policies and market our financial services products as long as market conditions allow, but the current legal and business environments with regard to homeowners and commercial insurance are becoming untenable," Trippel said.

In the Broussard case, State Farm denied the family's claim by insisting that all the damage was caused by storm surge. State Farm has said its homeowner policies cover damage from wind but not from water, and that the policies exclude damage that could have been caused by a combination of both, even if hurricane-force winds preceded a storm's rising water.

However, the judge ruled that State Farm couldn't prove that Katrina's storm surge was responsible for all of the damage to the Broussards' home. The judge also said the testimony failed to establish how much damage was caused by wind and how much resulted from storm surge.

In an interview with Insurance Journal, State Farm spokesman Fraser Engerman defended the insurer's claims handling. "We have honored the terms of the contract and we're proud of our commitment. We put over $1 billion back into the state," he said.

Engerman said the company did make a profit in 2005. "That shows that we are financially strong and that is good for our customers," he maintained. "A company that is financially and fiscally strong is a company that is looking out for the policyholders."

Sources: State Farm
Mississippi Attorney General
Mississippi Insurance Department

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
I care ???
May 9, 2007, 3:57 pm
RE: RE: No More Bubba
May 9, 2007, 3:14 pm
RE: No More History
May 9, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: History Bubba
May 9, 2007, 2:51 pm
RE: No More Bubba
May 9, 2007, 2:28 pm
No More The one who cares
May 9, 2007, 12:57 pm
RE: RE: History Melanie
May 9, 2007, 12:34 pm
RE: History Bubba
May 1, 2007, 9:11 pm
History Fraud is the name
May 1, 2007, 6:44 pm
??? History
May 1, 2007, 6:42 pm
Fraud?? melanie
May 1, 2007, 6:40 pm
RE: Fraud definition and conviction Bingo
May 1, 2007, 6:34 pm
Fraud definition and conviction
May 1, 2007, 2:22 pm
committed lots of
May 1, 2007, 1:17 pm
RE: RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insura Mjolnir
Apr 30, 2007, 2:21 pm
RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance. Hal
Apr 30, 2007, 8:46 am
A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance... Mjolnir
Apr 30, 2007, 8:14 am
@ pip cases ethics
Apr 29, 2007, 2:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Bubba
Apr 28, 2007, 9:34 pm
RE: RE: number? Sold Out we need laws Justice
Apr 28, 2007, 9:32 pm
RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Care
Apr 28, 2007, 9:21 pm
RE: Wrong number? Results
Apr 28, 2007, 9:12 pm
RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Sold Out
Apr 28, 2007, 9:10 pm
Wrong number? Bubba
Apr 28, 2007, 8:54 pm
RE: read!! remmber and thank you big wrong
Apr 28, 2007, 8:35 pm
read!! remmber and thank you Hope
Apr 28, 2007, 8:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you Faith
Apr 25, 2007, 11:21 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you Hal
Apr 24, 2007, 9:12 am
RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you no law State farm has no bars
Apr 23, 2007, 9:47 pm
RE: RE: remmber and thank you no more
Apr 23, 2007, 8:38 am
RE: remmber ed ivan is that really you?
Apr 23, 2007, 8:32 am
You Don't KNOW or won't tell me? Hal
Apr 22, 2007, 10:07 pm
RE: RE: WHY not answer my question? Faith
Apr 22, 2007, 8:20 pm
RE: WHY not answer my question? History
Apr 22, 2007, 8:10 pm
WHY not answer my question? Hal
Apr 22, 2007, 6:00 pm
RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT a -Z CARES
Apr 22, 2007, 3:14 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP THE REAL US
Apr 22, 2007, 3:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP SO VERY WRONG
Apr 22, 2007, 3:01 pm
RE: RE: State of Confusion TELL ME ABOUT THE LAW OF THE L
Apr 22, 2007, 2:52 pm
RE: State of Confusion Real stuff
Apr 22, 2007, 9:59 am
State of Confusion Hal
Apr 19, 2007, 11:42 am
RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT stand up .or wake up.CARE
Apr 19, 2007, 10:04 am
RE: sTATE OF WHAT Hal
Mar 19, 2007, 8:40 am
sTATE OF WHAT MELANIE
Mar 18, 2007, 7:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer Hal
Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm
RE: tree sap transfer hAL
Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm
RE: RE: tree sap transfer hAL
Mar 18, 2007, 6:10 pm
cALL THE ? WHO HOPE
Mar 18, 2007, 5:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... real / CLASS
Mar 18, 2007, 5:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... Neighbor
Mar 18, 2007, 4:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: SF ... care
Mar 18, 2007, 4:13 pm
RE: RE: SF ... SoWhat
Mar 18, 2007, 9:35 am
RE: SF ... mad
Mar 17, 2007, 6:36 pm
tree sap transfer-MORE_+ melanie
Mar 15, 2007, 10:29 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Dail
Feb 27, 2007, 9:46 am
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer ED
Feb 27, 2007, 9:37 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Ged
Feb 27, 2007, 9:31 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Muck
Feb 27, 2007, 9:19 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope- Jack Stampliker
Feb 27, 2007, 9:07 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Fait Jack Stampliker
Feb 27, 2007, 9:06 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Sap
Feb 27, 2007, 9:05 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Faith
Feb 27, 2007, 9:02 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Melanie
Feb 27, 2007, 8:56 am
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith melanie
Feb 27, 2007, 8:49 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Hal
Feb 27, 2007, 8:40 am
RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith mon (CODE)??///
Feb 27, 2007, 8:24 am
tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Ramondo Balaamababa
Feb 26, 2007, 11:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer Ann
Feb 25, 2007, 2:27 pm
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Hope- Faith
Feb 24, 2007, 11:47 am
RE: I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. Melanie
Feb 24, 2007, 11:29 am
To: GED Imposter (Kim David) The Original GED
Feb 23, 2007, 8:20 am
RE: tree sap transfer The Sap.
Feb 22, 2007, 12:29 pm
RE: tree sap transfer GED
Feb 22, 2007, 11:15 am
tree sap transfer Gill Fin
Feb 19, 2007, 4:59 pm
Katrina nutrition information chad balaamaba
Feb 19, 2007, 1:41 pm
Melanie Ramondo Balaamaba
Feb 19, 2007, 1:28 pm
RE: Reality of the situation william
Feb 19, 2007, 6:35 am
Case in point Melanie
Feb 18, 2007, 11:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 18, 2007, 12:15 pm
RE: RE: Reality of the situation Mjolnir
Feb 18, 2007, 9:32 am
Claims adjustors Hal
Feb 17, 2007, 3:19 pm
RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 17, 2007, 11:23 am
RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 17, 2007, 10:39 am
Reality of the situation Mike
Feb 16, 2007, 10:05 pm
know better Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 6:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 AL rules
Feb 16, 2007, 4:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 3:38 pm
RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Fred
Feb 16, 2007, 2:34 pm
I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. Ralph Balamabama
Feb 16, 2007, 2:09 pm
Lawyers needed to write Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 1:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. GED
Feb 16, 2007, 1:43 pm
RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL johnny b.
Feb 16, 2007, 1:32 pm
RE: RE: Lost Fred
Feb 16, 2007, 1:09 pm
RE: Lost in the hysteria.. Okay you win
Feb 16, 2007, 12:12 pm
RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. It,s Me Again
Feb 16, 2007, 12:09 pm
RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 12:03 pm
RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 12:00 pm
Lost in the hysteria.. Mjolnir
Feb 16, 2007, 11:47 am
Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Mjolnir
Feb 16, 2007, 11:44 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 11:41 am
RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 11:34 am
RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Ralph Balamabama
Feb 16, 2007, 11:16 am
RE: Hey Ralph Mel
Feb 16, 2007, 10:57 am
Hey Ralph Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 10:53 am
RE: Ms. Hodges... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:34 am
RE: RE: Money's not the only thing.... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:29 am
RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:24 am
RE: Money's not the only thing.... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:19 am
RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 10:15 am
RE: We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 10:03 am
Attorney General Send In The Troops...Attack! Sick of Insurance
Feb 15, 2007, 10:11 pm
LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Insured by State Farm
Feb 15, 2007, 7:05 pm
RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Duke
Feb 15, 2007, 6:03 pm
Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Ralph Balamabama
Feb 15, 2007, 5:31 pm
We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Chad Balaamaba
Feb 15, 2007, 4:44 pm
RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! jim
Feb 15, 2007, 4:36 pm
Stinking Contracts Contract Reader
Feb 15, 2007, 3:55 pm
I wonder Dan
Feb 15, 2007, 3:26 pm
RE: RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! DDT
Feb 15, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Fred
Feb 15, 2007, 3:00 pm
Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! WHITE BUDDHA
Feb 15, 2007, 2:45 pm
Money's not the only thing.... Mjolnir
Feb 15, 2007, 2:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Fred
Feb 15, 2007, 1:23 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie
Feb 15, 2007, 1:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? joe
Feb 15, 2007, 1:16 pm
RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie
Feb 15, 2007, 1:11 pm
Small insurors need customers too Hal
Feb 15, 2007, 1:08 pm
Ms. Hodges... DDT
Feb 15, 2007, 1:04 pm
RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Realist
Feb 15, 2007, 12:54 pm
RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie Hodges
Feb 15, 2007, 12:48 pm
What did the gulf states expect to happen? Mjolnir
Feb 15, 2007, 9:55 am
Commissioners are funny Hal
Feb 15, 2007, 8:49 am
SF ... William
Feb 15, 2007, 7:07 am