Your article said: “According to court records, the defense’s expert testified Simon was exposed to 46,000 times the safe level for exposure to leaded gasoline fumes.” That was the plaintiffs’ expert.
Once again, IJ’s horrendous editing surfaces; this article is so jumbled and disjointed in it’s flow, it’s as though somebody tripped with a box full of paragraphs and let them print where they fell…
Can anyone say deep pockets?
Your article said: “According to court records, the defense’s expert testified Simon was exposed to 46,000 times the safe level for exposure to leaded gasoline fumes.” That was the plaintiffs’ expert.
Once again, IJ’s horrendous editing surfaces; this article is so jumbled and disjointed in it’s flow, it’s as though somebody tripped with a box full of paragraphs and let them print where they fell…
Hey, plaintiffs’ lawyers have yacht payments too. Stop being so darned selfish.