Good for Mr. King. These condo association board members think they are the big guy in the sky, judge and jury. Not all, but most are snooty, pinky-up people who have nothing better to do than stick their noses where they don’t belong. If they had a sneaking suspicion, they should have fact checked first…once you call someone a pedophile, it is hard for that person to not be thought of that way even after cleared of any wrong doing…it always sits in the back of someone’s mind. They should be ashamed of themselves.
The first clues were (1) different name and (2) photo. While I disagree that most Condo Board members are “snooty, pinky-up people”, I agree that they should have checked their facts — more than once. Unless they circulate flyers relating to ALL sex offenders, they should not have circulated this one, let alone state that the two individuals were one and the same. I really want to see how the insurance company adjusts this claim, what with the rather deliberate actions taken by the board.
Well this did happen in South America. This stuff happens all the time in the mouth breather, booger eater, knuckle dragging states. I bet these huckleberries were running tactical drills in the woods as recess from the Klan and Tea Party meetings.
It happened in South America?? Really, Where? Brazil, Chile, Argentina? I think you need a run at some geographical skills. And what is with your “booger eating” fascination??
Good for Mr. King. These condo association board members think they are the big guy in the sky, judge and jury. Not all, but most are snooty, pinky-up people who have nothing better to do than stick their noses where they don’t belong. If they had a sneaking suspicion, they should have fact checked first…once you call someone a pedophile, it is hard for that person to not be thought of that way even after cleared of any wrong doing…it always sits in the back of someone’s mind. They should be ashamed of themselves.
The first clues were (1) different name and (2) photo. While I disagree that most Condo Board members are “snooty, pinky-up people”, I agree that they should have checked their facts — more than once. Unless they circulate flyers relating to ALL sex offenders, they should not have circulated this one, let alone state that the two individuals were one and the same. I really want to see how the insurance company adjusts this claim, what with the rather deliberate actions taken by the board.
Well this did happen in South America. This stuff happens all the time in the mouth breather, booger eater, knuckle dragging states. I bet these huckleberries were running tactical drills in the woods as recess from the Klan and Tea Party meetings.
It happened in South America?? Really, Where? Brazil, Chile, Argentina? I think you need a run at some geographical skills. And what is with your “booger eating” fascination??