Court Upholds 25% Rate Increase Rejection for North Carolina Homeowners

By | August 8, 2016

North Carolina’s insurance commissioner had plenty of justification to reject a 2014 request by insurers to raise homeowners’ premiums by an average of 25 percent, the state Court of Appeals ruled August 2.

Instead, Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin imposed a zero-percent overall increase beginning in June 2015 by increasing rates for renters and condominium policyholders while lowering them for homeowners.

Goodwin determined appropriately in late 2014 that insurers were achieving a fair and reasonable profit after North Carolina homeowners saw rates rise 7 percent on average beginning in 2013, the court said.

Goodwin was acting under established law by considering only what insurance companies were earning from policies, and excluding the gains or losses they made by investing the money, the court said.

“The order reflects a careful, thoughtful, and thorough consideration of the evidence,” Judge J. Douglas McCullough wrote for the three-judge panel.

It’s too early for insurance companies to say whether they will appeal to the state Supreme Court, North Carolina Rate Bureau General Manager Ray Evans said Tuesday.

The Rate Bureau sought an overall increase of about $500 million in homeowners’ premiums in 2014 to cover expectations of a sharp rise in repair and replacement costs and the growing risk of catastrophic losses from severe weather. Insurers complained that premiums were inadequate to make their risk worthwhile.

None of this has stopped insurers from raising rates meanwhile. Insurers have increasingly refused to issue policies unless homeowners sign an agreement accepting rates higher than those set by Goodwin’s office.

Such policies expanded in 2013 to 30 percent of North Carolina’s $2.4 billion homeowners market, up from 23 percent in 2010, according to state Insurance Department data.

In a statement released by the North Carolina Department of Insurance, Goodwin said the ruling represented a victory for consumers in the state.

“I rejected the insurance industry’s proposed rate increase because I felt it was unjust and I am very pleased that the Court agreed with my ruling. This action will save homeowners hundreds of millions of dollars in insurance premiums,” Goodwin said.

Related:

Topics Trends Carriers Pricing Trends North Carolina Homeowners

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • August 9, 2016 at 3:17 pm
    Rosenblatt says:
    Some relevant questions to try and figure out where the possible difference in rates comes from: What was the risk state? Are benefits payable at RC or ACV?
  • August 9, 2016 at 1:34 pm
    What Timing... says:
    $250 premium for renters insurance? I just rated one - $107 for 25k in contents. Big distance from here to $250.
  • August 9, 2016 at 2:44 am
    UW says:
    Even for a weirdo your obsessions are odd.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (5)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features