Nevada Court Cancels Big Construction Defect Award

December 20, 2005

Separate emails using a comma.

A multimillion-dollar construction defects award was erased Thursday by a unanimous Nevada Supreme Court decision that held the case had been improperly given class-action status by a lower court judge.
The high court ruling favors Beazer Homes Holding Corp. and went against homeowners who sued the company after finding cracks in foundations, walls and driveways at their North Las Vegas properties allegedly caused by expansive soil conditions.

“Because single-family residence constructional defect litigation often raises diverse, individualized claims and defenses, we conclude that, generally, the requirements for class action certification cannot be met,” Justice Jim Hardesty wrote.

During arguments before the Supreme Court, a Beazer attorney said a defect lawsuit involving The Villages at Craig Ranch homes should never have been made a class-action case, and that a $7.3 million jury verdict should be overturned. With interest, costs and attorneys fees, the total value of the case is about $15.6 million.

But lawyers for 200 Craig Ranch Village homeowners said class-action status was appropriate because the damages suffered were predominantly related to concrete pads that did not conform to the subdivision’s soil conditions. The homeowners had sought nearly $24 million.

The case involving Atlanta-based Beazer, which built the homes between 1994 and 1999, resulted in one of the longest and largest construction defect trials in Nevada history. The trial that began in 2002 lasted three months.

The Supreme Court ruling calls for new trials on all issues in the case.
Beazer attorneys have said a retrial of each case would be best for both the court system and the individuals with claims.

In the trial that ended in February 2003, a jury cleared Beazer of any violations of implied or expressed warranties and found contributing negligence by both the class-action members and Beazer — 7 percent on the part of the homeowners and 93 percent by the builder.

Separate emails using a comma.
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • March 8, 2007 at 3:49 am
    Cindy says:
    200 cases IS too many to be practical to handle individually. Also, if a builder routinely does things the same way, then it is logical that each house will have the same defe... read more
  • March 7, 2007 at 1:49 am
    Jesse says:
    Homeowners are often convinced that filing suit is their only or best option, even when they don\'t have problems with their homes. They are told that if they \"don\'t file, t... read more
  • December 21, 2005 at 10:05 am
    Cindy says:
    The plaintiffs already won this case and to have to try 200 cases again seperately essentially means the homeowners won\'t be able to get lawyers because, individually, the ca... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features