California Accuses Hartford Insurance Group of Charging Illegal Fees

April 11, 2006

California Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi announced that the California Department of Insurance (CDI) has begun legal proceedings against The Hartford Insurance Group alleging that the company charged illegal fees.

The complaint contends that The Hartford allowed one of its agents, Irvine, Calif.-based Superior Access Insurance Services, to charge and collect fees not approved by the Department of Insurance. CDI must approve all property and casualty insurance rates and charges pursuant to Proposition 103 and other laws.

“No person or company is above the law,” said Commissioner Garamendi. “These laws are intended to protect consumers against all types of fraud, and I intend to actively enforce them to their fullest extent.”

The Department contends that Superior Access, with Hartford’s knowledge, added unapproved fees, typically around $100 per policy, to the premium Hartford was allowed to charge by law. Thousands of commercial and personal line policyholders likely paid the illegal fees on workers’ compensation and business owner package policies.

Although Hartford did not actually receive the fees, California law treats the fees as if Hartford did receive them, since they were received by Superior Access as Hartford’s agent. The Department is investigating several general agents and insurance companies for similar infractions.

Latest Comments

  • October 8, 2009 at 9:11 am
    mary walker says:
    I have a complaint. I know that these employees get compensated for not paying claims. I am due money according to their own written policies and they are refusing to pay me... read more
  • May 10, 2006 at 10:58 am
    Raymond A. Greenberg says:
    re: insurance agent lawyer, 4/28/06: Only the legislature may set policy. It may delegate to an administrative agency the power to enact regs to implement that policy. 10CCR21... read more
  • April 28, 2006 at 6:17 am
    Raymond A. Greenberg says:
    Broker fees are legal, whether charged by an appointed agent or a broker and whether charged directly to an insured or by a wholesaler to the retailer, and whether charged on ... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More News
More News Features