Jury Awards $5.7 Million in Cancer Patient Malpractice Suit

May 25, 2007

Separate emails using a comma.

A Superior Court jury awarded $5.7 million in damages to a bedridden man who claimed a doctor failed to diagnose his skin cancer.

The verdict is the largest medical-malpractice award in California this year, but will be cut to $1.9 million under a state statute limiting damages in malpractice suits.

Regis M. Reilly, 53, claimed dermatologist James C. Powers failed to biopsy a cyst that later metastasized into cancer. Reilly has a family history of skin cancer.

“I wanted my clients to hear someone say that what they went through had real value,” said Reilly’s attorney, N. Denise Asher.

The award included $3 million in general damages for Reilly’s wife to compensate for the negative impact on the couple’s marriage. Reilly won another $1.6 million for his own mental pain and suffering and $1.1 million for lost income.

Powers’ attorney, Nancy Vaughan, could not immediately be reached for comment.

Reilly went through several surgeries to remove the cancer and is now is confined to his home where he receives 24-hour care.

The verdict exceeded a $5.3 million settlement in a malpractice case, also in San Diego, involving a brain-damaged infant and a $556,900 award in another misdiagnosis case.

Separate emails using a comma.
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • June 1, 2007 at 12:25 pm
    Beans says:
    Yeah I have been following this case through someone who was there and I\'m on the doctors side. A previous doctor referred the patient to the defendant. Told him it was a cy... read more
  • May 29, 2007 at 9:14 am
    ES says:
    Did I read that correctly? She was awarded $3 million and he only got $2.7 and he\'s the one with cancer and the victim of \"malpractice.\" What a world we live in.
  • May 29, 2007 at 8:27 am
    Bill Reed says:
    In order to portray these types of scenarios in a fair and complete way, commentary on the defense arguments should be included, assuming of course there are any. It would als... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features