California’s Prop. 33 is Bomb-Tossing Battle to the End

By | November 5, 2012

  • November 6, 2012 at 12:16 pm
    Knowldege says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I do not really understand the arguments against this proposition.

    It just rewards people who are responsible and pay their insurance bills. It also rewards military personnel.

    The only people who pay more are those who willfully did not pay for insurance.

  • November 6, 2012 at 1:37 pm
    Another Country Heard from says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ultimately, if everybody gets the same discount, it ends up being nothing more than a defacto rate reduction. The issue of customer loyalty to one insurance company should be a stacked discount based on the number of years with a specific company, 5% for 2 years, 10% for 3, 15% for 5. This would recognize specific cost savings for the reduced acquisition costs that apply to renewal business over time.

  • November 6, 2012 at 1:50 pm
    Center Point says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    In a way, it’s really not that much different from Obamacare in that those who are insured stand to benefit from a larger insurance pool of paid policies. Those who go without insurance should pay a higher price as it’s likely that they will at some time incur expenses in car accidents and hospital emergency rooms.

    Just my two cents.

    • November 6, 2012 at 3:59 pm
      Tawana says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      How does every issue get back to Obama????

      • November 6, 2012 at 5:26 pm
        Center Point says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        Ummm, election day?

        Setting aside partisan feelings, if one supports offering discounts to people who do insure — and by extension debiting those who do not buy insurance but ought to, then it should make no difference what line of insurance it is.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*