Wearing three different designers in one outing seems more like an assault on fashion than an accident, but I do agree she should be compensated if for no other reason than to support the local Nordstrom !
Subject to actual cash value or replacement cost? Once worn/used I don’t imagine used designer items or clothes go for anywhere near retail? But what do I know, if I pay more than $30 for a shirt I feel like I’ve been robbed.
It’s got to be ACV. Just out of curiosity, I googled ‘Chanel Handbags,’ and it looks like a brand new one can easily cost $4k. Adding in the coat and boots, I’m kind of surprised she’s not asking for more.
Oregon does tend to keep the lawyers busy, don’t they? Case after case just on this forum shows that to be true. My favorite was the woman student in the dorm moving the bed near a window and then falling out and suing.
so close agent. you ALMOST remembered something correctly. why let those pesky facts get in the way? who cares what really happened anyway, right?
A) That was a Virginia Tech student – it happened in Virginia and not Oregon
B) More importantly — Mindy Somers’ father did not take legal action! He wanted Tech officials to examine the safety issues and consider a memorial scholarship for his daughter, which they did.
confused,
Agent never claimed to have a Donald Trump memory. You know, the greatest memory ever (self-proclaimed). Which begs a question to Donald’s statement about Muslims tailgating and celebrating 911, “I saw it on TV. I don’t remember where I saw it, but I saw it.” How does, “I don’t remember where I saw it” = greatest memory ever?
December 30, 2015 at 9:58 am
confused says:
Like or Dislike:
4
13
you’re right Captain, Agent never claimed to have a great memory. that said, he consistently posts about things that never happened the way he ‘remembers’ it did. just like when he sums up articles and completely misses the point. when he makes those kinds of false statements, the truth needs to be posted too so we can discuss facts and not just his marred-by-time false memories.
December 30, 2015 at 2:03 pm
bob says:
Like or Dislike:
12
5
Instead of catch phrases like Mit Robmey, Donald Trump’s character and memory or arrogance (which Obama does for a fact have as well in regards to arrogance and over stepping bounds) and trickle down economics (on the negative end for you Planet) argue against their politics using facts.
Or are those pesky facts too difficult for either of you?
December 30, 2015 at 12:29 pm
bob says:
Hot debate. What do you think?
14
10
“My favorite was the woman student in the dorm moving the bed near a window and then falling out and suing.”
Nowhere in this sentence does he say that she fell out of her bed while moving the bed. Nowhere. It in fact says “and then” time not specified. The time frame of the “and then” could easily have been while sleeping.
UW is correct, you attempt to find errors in Agent’s comments just to revive your bigotry against conservatives not using pesky facts.
Knock it off kiddo.
You don’t have half his free thinking mentality. Even if he were wrong on half the things he said (an overstatement) he shouldn’t be degraded constantly with thinks like you just said, and, moreover, it means that the things he does have right should be taken seriously.
You try to find anything he says to not take him seriously 100% of the time.
It’s unethical, and it’s also a slash and burn mentality. This is the same mentality, ironically, you believe republicans employ. If you’re not with us, you’re against us! How can we allow republican be allowed to be considered truthful or intelligent?
After all, how can we fix Muslim relations while we still call them all terrorists?
Hypocrisy is strong in this one. You just don’t know yourself well enough to realize it yet. Maybe if you stopped harping on others…Just a thought.
A: I just found out something I will link below, because you just made a dumb ass move that I only just realized while writing B on this comment, because I wanted to look into the memorial you mentioned. It didn’t make sense, since Agent implied the person who fell out the window sued. You implied the father took some sort of action and the daughter died (memorial scholarship after all). This made it clear, ABSOLUTELY CLEAR to your average non bigoted voter, that you were both talking about a different event. But to you, it meant that he was “wrong” and didn’t know how to interpret those pesky facts, eh?
Your B: This is hardly a major or “more importantly” comment, as safety issues that were presented would have been the student’s issue and not the School. That is the point Agent was making.
You wanted to believe he didn’t know facts so much, you MISSED THE ACTUAL ONE HE WAS REFERRING TO.
No coincidence you do this often. You try to make up some crap about what republicans are doing and or saying, and miss the entirety of the actual situation often. You always think you know better, and it’s a weakness. You don’t.
Hi Bob, I trust you had a great Christmas and look forward to the new year. After all, it is the last year of Obama and that is something to look forward to. I was out for a few hours seeing a client and when I got back, I saw that Confused down thumbed me 82 times for my comment. That takes some effort these days. What an angry Progressive slob he is. I am sure he won’t own up to his mistake attacking my post. Progressives can never be wrong, can they? I knew my memory was fine and thank you for the link to refresh it. By the way, the worst trolls on this site are Planet, UW & Confused. They are the attack dogs of the left. They are not interested in honest debate and only search out my posts to post their venom. I’m still here. Perhaps some therapy would do them some good. I have recommended to Planet that he go to Pastor Mike and seek some spiritual advice. Obviously, the Lutheran church he attends does not preach basic good will or manners.
December 30, 2015 at 5:05 pm
bob says:
Like or Dislike:
8
2
Agent,
What upset me and had me swearing is that I believed Confused at first.
I thought you messed up to some capacity, without any evidence to the contrary. I don’t like having someone cause facts to go out the window on character damaging issues.
It’s not fair to you, and it was a mistake on my end as well.
December 30, 2015 at 5:07 pm
bob says:
Like or Dislike:
8
2
Agent,
Also, yes, I had a good holiday. I hope you did as well.
December 30, 2015 at 3:26 pm
bob says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14
3
Hey UW:
Looks like I ticked off and or embarrassed either Planet or Confused, and they are desperately trying to hide where I pointed out they were in fact the ones wrong, not Agent.
Censorship police in the liberals here are out again.
Better try to make sure you silence us conservatives.
We will not be nom nom nom nom White Castle SILENCED!!
December 30, 2015 at 3:57 pm
Peter D. says:
Like or Dislike:
4
0
Maybe you could give them more than 2 hours to reply?
December 30, 2015 at 5:06 pm
bob says:
Like or Dislike:
11
3
Peter,
There is no reply for this. Further: Maybe you’re wrong that they aren’t already replying?
Maybe?
See what I’m doing with the?
Maybe their reply is the quickness of down votes on solely my and Agent’s original post.
Perhaps, that is their reply?
Maybe?
December 30, 2015 at 5:24 pm
Agent says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12
2
Peter, I kind of think Confused spent two hours down voting my post so that was his reply.
December 31, 2015 at 1:45 pm
Agent says:
Like or Dislike:
4
1
Bob, we all know you are a smart guy and do your research before you post. Please be advised that you almost believing Confused, UW, Planet, Ron and a few others shows some naivety when all they do is post ugly remarks trying to denigrate me in some way. It is all garbage and you should just turn a jaundiced eye toward it. Thanks for your friendship and hope you have a great New Year.
January 4, 2016 at 1:19 pm
Bob says:
Like or Dislike:
3
1
Agent,
Despite getting somewhat older I still retain a good chunk of my naivety. That’s absolutely true. I need to also tone it done, much like many other people here.
I appreciate your understanding on the matter.
I can tell you’re a good guy, I appreciate the friendship as well.
December 30, 2015 at 10:45 am
UW Supreme says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
19
8
You libtards are just seething through your Cheeto breath, sitting & waiting for Agent to make some sort of honest mistake so you can pounce, make a nonsense political argument and shout “victory is MINE”.
But alas, no one is home to hear your shrill squawks. Your parents are at work while you’re in their basement at 47 years of age. You realize this, momentarily regretting all of your life’s decisions. You look at yourself in the mirror wondering “what have I done?”, but nothing can erase the black void in the pits of your overgrown bellies. There is a pain there from years of burger abuse. Mmmmm burgers. You quickly make your way up to your parents’ kitchen and microwave those White Castle leftovers they bought you yesterday when you had a “good day” and promised to “find your own place real soon”. You lifted their hopes once more. It WAS a good day.
Yes, White Castle and white lies temporarily satiates the demon seed of Mom & Dad, and the IJ trolling continues in their darkened basement. The circle is complete for now.
These particular liberals are so well researched, know so well what they are talking about, and are such avid truthsayers, that they cannot even do a simple fact check to confirm Agent didn’t know what he was talking about.
I mean really, if they couldn’t fact check a simple Oregon woman how the hell do these morons fact check something like the healthcare law? Taxes? Business structures that are best for the economy?
It seems confused can’t even handle the smallest of facts being said by a republican, without believing they are wrong.
Other than Confused and Planet no one has any reason to be upset with this post. Look at the post above it for God’s sakes. Supreme just insulted all Liberals as Libtards. A word I won’t use since I consider it derogatory.
I course corrected him by stating “These particular” liberals. I was restricting the context to solely 2 liberals here.
Considering how many people conversely have disliked posts saying similar things fro liberals against agent (Agent being a troll, agent not having reading comprehension) I must assume that either there is an anti conservative bias here (but history will show there isn’t, this site if anything leans a little on the right) or that the people disliking the post have a vested interest in disliking it and defending themselves, or like the people they are defending.
I don’t imagine Planet have many people who like them though, as their posts have 1 like each.
This is called critical thinking. It’s a bit like Sherlock with me, and this is why I’m generally right when I make a comment such as the above.
Maybe you need to learn how to process the likelihood of certain scenarios?
I consider myself a cross breed of Spock and Sherlock.
Or should I say: I consider myself a cross breed of Spock and Sherlock?
You sound like an episode of Daria I saw many years ago that stuck with me:
“Okay, so one, like, method or whatever to make your voice sound more cheery is to end each sentence as if you’re asking a question? ‘Cause then you sound, like, perky? “
December 30, 2015 at 4:30 pm
Agent says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18
3
Good one Supreme. You have a great way of putting things and actually putting down the libtards on this blog. They remind me a lot of the Affluenza teen they found in Mexico. He was never taught right from wrong by his parents, never had to be responsible for his actions and emotionally immature.
I want to apologize for not defending you on this more often.
It took me until my second comment to realize you actually did not mess up in your comment and that means I have allowed these false moderates like Ron to shake my opinion of you.
I have defended you on occasion, but clearly not enough if my first thought was that you misspoke. You don’t deserve to be thought of as an error prone commentator.
1. I NEVER claimed to be a moderate, so please refrain from mentioning that term in reference to me.
2. The reason I have shaken your opinion of Agent is because I have proven him to be wrong and a hypocrite multiple times. Can you identify any one example of when I presented false information as proof of Agent being wrong or a hypocrite?
1. Directly no, but you have claimed to be conservative in some areas while claiming to be liberal in others. Have you not? This is essentially your attempt of twisting semantics. Are you, or are you not a moderate by the very definition of the word if you do not hold to any one particular party, and you supposedly have voted both democrat and republican? You have given this image quite intentionally, if you don’t like that, don’t do it! Not only are you faking being a moderate you won’t even own up to that!
2. No. It’s largely due to HOW you attack agent and claim he has bad reading comprehension for grammatical errors. Usually agent goes over the top. I have said this before. You use that to disregard his concepts often, when you aren’t outright mocking his source.
December 31, 2015 at 1:20 pm
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
1
4
bob,
1. Yes. I am fiscally Conservative and socially Liberal and that makes me an Independent. It’s not semantics, just simple understanding. In my opinion, a moderate is one who is a Democrat or Republican, but is not a Liberal or Conservative, and they will vote against their own party occasionally.
2. As I said in another post, he has brought how I and others treat him upon himself. He constantly insults me, falsely characterizes my beliefs, and refuses to accept the multiple olive branches I have extended. In addition, he refuses to answer questions directly. he may think he does, but he is usually just posting some irrelevant rant to detract form what I asked. When he or anyone else asks me a question, I post the question then provide my response.
Funny thing is, I agree with him more than I disagree. However, he will not even acknowledge that.
December 31, 2015 at 12:02 pm
Agent says:
Like or Dislike:
7
1
Bob, you may have noticed that Ron said he never claimed to be a Moderate. He was just a Progressive Socialist Independent who researched candidates before elections and then voted for the most Progressive Socialist President in the nation’s history – twice. We all know where he is coming from on every article.
Please quantify how you came up with labeling President Obama the most Progressive Socialist President in the nation’s history. Please list all of the Socialist programs, based on the true definition of Socialism, that he has implemented since he became the President. Here are some, not all, that came before him: Department of Defense, Public Education, Public Libraries, Social Security, IRS, Medicaid and Medicare, EPA, and VA. These are actual Socialist, unlike the PPACA.
December 31, 2015 at 12:44 pm
bob says:
Like or Dislike:
4
1
Moderate – Independent.
The wording here is what you’re playing at. Both you and confused do this often.
You know darn well you’re a self claimed no strings attached moderate, who would vote for either party.
Do you wish to recant this? Do you hang the liberal party line? You claim you don’t. This is why I call you a false moderate.
You attack the right, and claim you’re an independent.
Don’t argue semiotics. You know my concept is right.
January 4, 2016 at 5:56 pm
Agent says:
Like or Dislike:
3
1
Bob, I hope you now have ownership in your organization as you intimated last year. You will be a fine addition in helping your organization achieve it’s goals. This is a tough business to be in with what is going on in the market. We roll with the punches and are still here.
Comments start off kind of fun and interesting regarding a different kind of claim, and you guys manage to turn it into a personal and political bash session.
Here is a thought….sometimes it is not all about you and your personal agenda !
Agreed – it would be nice if we could keep the attacks to a minimum and just discuss the topic the article is about. I’m sure people didn’t come to the comment thread to read confused getting after Agent and bob getting after confused. I realize this post does not yet achieve the goal of keeping the comments on-topic with the article, but hopefully it’s not throwing gas on the already inflamed negative comments. That said…
“Several Portland attorneys said they have never had a client seek compensation for designer clothes”
But if her clothes were damaged due to the negligence of someone else, she’s entitled to reimbursement for the same! Unless the carrier denied her claim outright or applied, say, 50% betterment even though the items were just a year old, I don’t see why this is even an issue.
I did what was right in the scenario. Confused is the only person you need to mention, as well as Planet. You don’t get to ride the make yourself feel like a good person by saying people didn’t come here to see my go after someone, following agreeing with someone saying not everything is about your personal agenda.
That’s true, for Confused. As soon as confused takes a personal assault, people are not only vindicated by defending agent, they are SUPPOSED to defend agent. In school people like you watched the bullies fight, and allowed and enabled it by calling everyone the instigator, even the people defending themselves.
This is not a “everyone is messing up scenario”
This is a everyone needs to tell confused, “You screwed up buddy, you need to treat Agent better”
You have countless times directly and solely said this to Agent, and now that it’s someone attacking Agent you refuse to comment except insulting him as well. whenever someone attacks agent you include agent in who needs to be better. Vice versa with Ron etc you don’t.
The two comments below mandated a response to the people who tarnished Agent’s character and belittled him.
Also, it needed to be corrected in terms of non ethical points. Confused did not reference the correct event.
“confused says:
Like or Dislike:
Thumb up 2
Thumb down 4
so close agent. you ALMOST remembered something correctly. why let those pesky facts get in the way? who cares what really happened anyway, right?
A) That was a Virginia Tech student – it happened in Virginia and not Oregon
B) More importantly — Mindy Somers’ father did not take legal action! He wanted Tech officials to examine the safety issues and consider a memorial scholarship for his daughter, which they did.
“confused,
Agent never claimed to have a Donald Trump memory. You know, the greatest memory ever (self-proclaimed). Which begs a question to Donald’s statement about Muslims tailgating and celebrating 911, “I saw it on TV. I don’t remember where I saw it, but I saw it.” How does, “I don’t remember where I saw it” = greatest memory ever?”
Bob, thank you for the support, but I have been handling bullies for a long time. I remember in Jr High that there was a notorious bully always picking on someone smaller than him. I was also smaller than him and he started in on me one day. I told him, why don’t we settle this after school? We did and I kicked his butt all over the playground. It seemed that he really didn’t know how to fight. Guess what happened, after it was over, we shook hands and he also stopped his bullying on others. We actually were friends in High School. All he needed was a lesson and he got one.
The only difference between that bully and you is that he was actually smart enough to learn his lesson.
The fact that you think anyone else on this blog is any more a bully that you or bob is laughable. If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.
December 31, 2015 at 7:53 am
Rosenblatt says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
21
8
Bob – I will not continue down the path of who said what to whom and who needs to be chastised or what-not. The sole point of my reply was to “…achieve the goal of keeping the comments on-topic with the article.” Since you didn’t comment on the article and just kept on with the personal attacks/discussion, I am not feeding into this conversation. Want to talk about the article? I’ll be happy to oblige and discuss that with you instead.
Bob, I believe the leftists have labeled me a bully on this site for showing backbone against their attacks. As I recall, you have been labeled that many, many times starting way back in the Libby days and going forward. These leftist children really don’t want to hear the truth so they name call, scream when they can’t win an argument.
So, when you refuse to take it, you are showing a backbone, but if I don’t take it from you, bob or any other far right lunatic, I just won’t learn?
You are the biggest hypocrite on this site, period.
bob was labeled a bully because he is. How many times has he used demeaning, foul language in his posts to try and put others down? Where were you condemning him? Maybe you were too busy applauding him for “handing others their heads” when all he was really doing was trying to drown his opponents.
December 30, 2015 at 5:35 pm
Agent says:
Like or Dislike:
10
5
Rosenblatt, I have a new project for you. How about you compile some stats on how many times I make a comment about an article and how many times the attack dog trolls UW, Confused, Planet post their hate and vitriol no matter what the subject is. I can defend myself, but they are like immature children as Bob has pointed out on a number of occasions. Ron is terribly sarcastic, but generally not as hateful. Progressivism is a mental disease. They prove it every day.
My tally is 100% of the time. If you bothered to note it, you would see the same thing, time after time.
December 31, 2015 at 11:44 am
Truth says:
Hot debate. What do you think?
8
12
Hello Mike. I hope all is well with you. I am…frightened. Had I known your true persona (the one you demonstrate here) I would have never done business with you. You seem like such a nice man in person. Really, a nice man. Are these comments you publish really how you feel about your fellow man? I simply cannot believe you are so intolerant. I may not necessarily agree with the liberal agenda but that does not mean I slew hatred towards anyone who follows that path. You know, Mike, it took one search of your name to be linked to this little blog. I couldn’t believe it. I don’t know. This is seriously alarming. You have hid behind this “Agent” moniker for quite some time it seems. I’m going to do the people of our city a favor.
Planet, your lies will catch up with you sooner or later, hopefully sooner.
December 31, 2015 at 1:06 pm
Truth says:
Like or Dislike:
3
5
I don’t know what you mean by Planet but your response seems pretty typical when considering your behavior on this blog. Maybe, just maybe, your lies have finally caught up with you. Maybe, that smile you present yourself with in person has finally cracked. I liked you, Mike. I hope that these things I have read are all fabrications. I am utterly appalled by the hatred you spew.
December 31, 2015 at 1:36 pm
Agent says:
Like or Dislike:
5
6
Hey Truth, what a moniker name and couldn’t be farther from it. Planet is one of the ones who has been doing moniker theft for a couple of years now and he, along with Ins102 and others post all the time on several fake monikers and hacked my identity. Up until now, he is the only one I know of to use my name unless you picked up on it. How about revealing your real name so I can see who I am dealing with. My guess is that you are from NY and are a trouble maker like the rest of them are.
December 31, 2015 at 1:47 pm
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
5
5
Agent,
Why are you so quick to accuse others without any evidence?
Sounds like Truth is a former client or business partner of yours and you just keep on insulting him/her.
Good job.
December 31, 2015 at 2:04 pm
Truth says:
Like or Dislike:
2
4
I am from Harrison. That is all you need to know. I am not here to play your games. I am not here to assume your identity or to try and make you look bad. Quite simply I feel disappointed in what I have discovered. Mike, please stop doing this. You are better than all of this. Well, I thought you were. And to Ron – just leave him alone. You seem like a respectful person and truth is in person he comes off as being one as well. Do not engage him anymore. He belittles you and you do not deserve he. No one does.
Ron, he could save me the trouble by identifying himself. I have been careful not to write anyone with his belief system and I don’t have any former Partners since we have the original Partners and they all are as Conservative as I am.
Why should he/she identify him/herself? You have not.
This is your problem. What exactly is Truth’s belief system and how do you know that it is a man? Please use Truth’s exact words from his/her posts to support your position.
I did not say he/she was a partner. I said, “Sounds like Truth is a former client or business partner” However, Truth did indicate a previous business relationship. I was covering both of the possibilities.
bob,
This is what I was talking about regarding Agent. Now do you see?
Ron, bob does not believe anything you have to say on any subject. We all know he has handed you your head on every subject before this forum. Truth is not a former client or partner and I have no idea where Harrison is. Is it Harrison NY, Harrison, Ark. By the way, everyone knows who I am after the ID theft was perpetrated by Ins102 and every one of the other moniker thieves jumped on the bandwagon.
January 4, 2016 at 9:23 pm
Ron says:
Like or Dislike:
3
4
Agent,
Did you voluntarily identify yourself or was someone else smart enough to figure you out?
bob is the one who stated, “I have allowed these false moderates like Ron to shake my opinion of you.” See how I use his exact words to prove that he, to some extant, did believe me?
If you do not know who Truth is, how can you possibly know that he/she is not a former client or business partner?
If you would stop making rash judgments about others based on unfounded assumptions, you might have some credibility. However, I get the sense that credibility is not that important to you.
January 5, 2016 at 9:54 am
Agent says:
Like or Dislike:
4
5
Ok Truth, without identifying yourself to the forum, are you an Insurance Company man or with a Wholesale Brokerage? Give me the name of the company or brokerage and I will go through my contacts and figure out who you are and it will keep your identity secret from the rest of the posters. And I am disappointed that you are disappointed in my having a backbone against the 5 or 6 main antagonists who jump on me at the drop of a hat.
You brought this upon yourself when you first incorrectly labelled me a Progressive, Socialist, Liberal Democrat and refused to apologize when I corrected you. Then, when I extended an olive branch multiple times, you decided to continue with your insults instead of accepting it and moving forward in a civil manner.
You are a misinformed, irrational, uneducated, thin-skinned bully, period.
Why not? If they were destroyed she should be compensated.
Agreed. When I went down on my bike the driver who caused it paid for my gear that was lost. Don’t see any difference here.
Wearing three different designers in one outing seems more like an assault on fashion than an accident, but I do agree she should be compensated if for no other reason than to support the local Nordstrom !
Ugh. Everyone knows Channel and Prada don’t go together.
The fashion court called and they left a message:
CLAIM DENIED, girlfriend!
Bravo.
I love this comment.
Subject to actual cash value or replacement cost? Once worn/used I don’t imagine used designer items or clothes go for anywhere near retail? But what do I know, if I pay more than $30 for a shirt I feel like I’ve been robbed.
It’s got to be ACV. Just out of curiosity, I googled ‘Chanel Handbags,’ and it looks like a brand new one can easily cost $4k. Adding in the coat and boots, I’m kind of surprised she’s not asking for more.
OBob, it might depend on how old the clothes were. I think I might depreciate them about 50% if I were the adjustor on the ACV formula.
Apparently her underwear was too racy to add to the claim.
Or just too boring.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
so close agent. you ALMOST remembered something correctly. why let those pesky facts get in the way? who cares what really happened anyway, right?
A) That was a Virginia Tech student – it happened in Virginia and not Oregon
B) More importantly — Mindy Somers’ father did not take legal action! He wanted Tech officials to examine the safety issues and consider a memorial scholarship for his daughter, which they did.
C) She was sleeping and fell out of her bed on the 6th floor – she wasn’t moving her bed
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
you’re right Captain, Agent never claimed to have a great memory. that said, he consistently posts about things that never happened the way he ‘remembers’ it did. just like when he sums up articles and completely misses the point. when he makes those kinds of false statements, the truth needs to be posted too so we can discuss facts and not just his marred-by-time false memories.
Instead of catch phrases like Mit Robmey, Donald Trump’s character and memory or arrogance (which Obama does for a fact have as well in regards to arrogance and over stepping bounds) and trickle down economics (on the negative end for you Planet) argue against their politics using facts.
Or are those pesky facts too difficult for either of you?
“My favorite was the woman student in the dorm moving the bed near a window and then falling out and suing.”
Nowhere in this sentence does he say that she fell out of her bed while moving the bed. Nowhere. It in fact says “and then” time not specified. The time frame of the “and then” could easily have been while sleeping.
UW is correct, you attempt to find errors in Agent’s comments just to revive your bigotry against conservatives not using pesky facts.
Knock it off kiddo.
You don’t have half his free thinking mentality. Even if he were wrong on half the things he said (an overstatement) he shouldn’t be degraded constantly with thinks like you just said, and, moreover, it means that the things he does have right should be taken seriously.
You try to find anything he says to not take him seriously 100% of the time.
It’s unethical, and it’s also a slash and burn mentality. This is the same mentality, ironically, you believe republicans employ. If you’re not with us, you’re against us! How can we allow republican be allowed to be considered truthful or intelligent?
After all, how can we fix Muslim relations while we still call them all terrorists?
Hypocrisy is strong in this one. You just don’t know yourself well enough to realize it yet. Maybe if you stopped harping on others…Just a thought.
Also:
A: I just found out something I will link below, because you just made a dumb ass move that I only just realized while writing B on this comment, because I wanted to look into the memorial you mentioned. It didn’t make sense, since Agent implied the person who fell out the window sued. You implied the father took some sort of action and the daughter died (memorial scholarship after all). This made it clear, ABSOLUTELY CLEAR to your average non bigoted voter, that you were both talking about a different event. But to you, it meant that he was “wrong” and didn’t know how to interpret those pesky facts, eh?
Your B: This is hardly a major or “more importantly” comment, as safety issues that were presented would have been the student’s issue and not the School. That is the point Agent was making.
But moreover:
DO A GOD DAMN GOOGLE SEARCH.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/oregon-woman-falls-out-bedroom-window-while-sleeping-sues-apartment
You wanted to believe he didn’t know facts so much, you MISSED THE ACTUAL ONE HE WAS REFERRING TO.
No coincidence you do this often. You try to make up some crap about what republicans are doing and or saying, and miss the entirety of the actual situation often. You always think you know better, and it’s a weakness. You don’t.
Hi Bob, I trust you had a great Christmas and look forward to the new year. After all, it is the last year of Obama and that is something to look forward to. I was out for a few hours seeing a client and when I got back, I saw that Confused down thumbed me 82 times for my comment. That takes some effort these days. What an angry Progressive slob he is. I am sure he won’t own up to his mistake attacking my post. Progressives can never be wrong, can they? I knew my memory was fine and thank you for the link to refresh it. By the way, the worst trolls on this site are Planet, UW & Confused. They are the attack dogs of the left. They are not interested in honest debate and only search out my posts to post their venom. I’m still here. Perhaps some therapy would do them some good. I have recommended to Planet that he go to Pastor Mike and seek some spiritual advice. Obviously, the Lutheran church he attends does not preach basic good will or manners.
Agent,
What upset me and had me swearing is that I believed Confused at first.
I thought you messed up to some capacity, without any evidence to the contrary. I don’t like having someone cause facts to go out the window on character damaging issues.
It’s not fair to you, and it was a mistake on my end as well.
Agent,
Also, yes, I had a good holiday. I hope you did as well.
Hey UW:
Looks like I ticked off and or embarrassed either Planet or Confused, and they are desperately trying to hide where I pointed out they were in fact the ones wrong, not Agent.
Censorship police in the liberals here are out again.
Better try to make sure you silence us conservatives.
We will not be nom nom nom nom White Castle SILENCED!!
Maybe you could give them more than 2 hours to reply?
Peter,
There is no reply for this. Further: Maybe you’re wrong that they aren’t already replying?
Maybe?
See what I’m doing with the?
Maybe their reply is the quickness of down votes on solely my and Agent’s original post.
Perhaps, that is their reply?
Maybe?
Peter, I kind of think Confused spent two hours down voting my post so that was his reply.
Bob, we all know you are a smart guy and do your research before you post. Please be advised that you almost believing Confused, UW, Planet, Ron and a few others shows some naivety when all they do is post ugly remarks trying to denigrate me in some way. It is all garbage and you should just turn a jaundiced eye toward it. Thanks for your friendship and hope you have a great New Year.
Agent,
Despite getting somewhat older I still retain a good chunk of my naivety. That’s absolutely true. I need to also tone it done, much like many other people here.
I appreciate your understanding on the matter.
I can tell you’re a good guy, I appreciate the friendship as well.
You libtards are just seething through your Cheeto breath, sitting & waiting for Agent to make some sort of honest mistake so you can pounce, make a nonsense political argument and shout “victory is MINE”.
But alas, no one is home to hear your shrill squawks. Your parents are at work while you’re in their basement at 47 years of age. You realize this, momentarily regretting all of your life’s decisions. You look at yourself in the mirror wondering “what have I done?”, but nothing can erase the black void in the pits of your overgrown bellies. There is a pain there from years of burger abuse. Mmmmm burgers. You quickly make your way up to your parents’ kitchen and microwave those White Castle leftovers they bought you yesterday when you had a “good day” and promised to “find your own place real soon”. You lifted their hopes once more. It WAS a good day.
Yes, White Castle and white lies temporarily satiates the demon seed of Mom & Dad, and the IJ trolling continues in their darkened basement. The circle is complete for now.
Agent didn’t even make a mistake on this one.
These particular liberals are so well researched, know so well what they are talking about, and are such avid truthsayers, that they cannot even do a simple fact check to confirm Agent didn’t know what he was talking about.
I mean really, if they couldn’t fact check a simple Oregon woman how the hell do these morons fact check something like the healthcare law? Taxes? Business structures that are best for the economy?
It seems confused can’t even handle the smallest of facts being said by a republican, without believing they are wrong.
Peter D:
Other than Confused and Planet no one has any reason to be upset with this post. Look at the post above it for God’s sakes. Supreme just insulted all Liberals as Libtards. A word I won’t use since I consider it derogatory.
I course corrected him by stating “These particular” liberals. I was restricting the context to solely 2 liberals here.
Considering how many people conversely have disliked posts saying similar things fro liberals against agent (Agent being a troll, agent not having reading comprehension) I must assume that either there is an anti conservative bias here (but history will show there isn’t, this site if anything leans a little on the right) or that the people disliking the post have a vested interest in disliking it and defending themselves, or like the people they are defending.
I don’t imagine Planet have many people who like them though, as their posts have 1 like each.
This is called critical thinking. It’s a bit like Sherlock with me, and this is why I’m generally right when I make a comment such as the above.
Maybe you need to learn how to process the likelihood of certain scenarios?
I consider myself a cross breed of Spock and Sherlock.
Or should I say: I consider myself a cross breed of Spock and Sherlock?
You sound like an episode of Daria I saw many years ago that stuck with me:
“Okay, so one, like, method or whatever to make your voice sound more cheery is to end each sentence as if you’re asking a question? ‘Cause then you sound, like, perky? “
Good one Supreme. You have a great way of putting things and actually putting down the libtards on this blog. They remind me a lot of the Affluenza teen they found in Mexico. He was never taught right from wrong by his parents, never had to be responsible for his actions and emotionally immature.
Agent,
I want to apologize for not defending you on this more often.
It took me until my second comment to realize you actually did not mess up in your comment and that means I have allowed these false moderates like Ron to shake my opinion of you.
I have defended you on occasion, but clearly not enough if my first thought was that you misspoke. You don’t deserve to be thought of as an error prone commentator.
8 Dislikes, wow, and the liberals here think this comment should be disliked?
Because it isn’t hip I gather. Or it’s one liberal censoring.
It’s okay bob, I liked it.
bob,
1. I NEVER claimed to be a moderate, so please refrain from mentioning that term in reference to me.
2. The reason I have shaken your opinion of Agent is because I have proven him to be wrong and a hypocrite multiple times. Can you identify any one example of when I presented false information as proof of Agent being wrong or a hypocrite?
1. Directly no, but you have claimed to be conservative in some areas while claiming to be liberal in others. Have you not? This is essentially your attempt of twisting semantics. Are you, or are you not a moderate by the very definition of the word if you do not hold to any one particular party, and you supposedly have voted both democrat and republican? You have given this image quite intentionally, if you don’t like that, don’t do it! Not only are you faking being a moderate you won’t even own up to that!
2. No. It’s largely due to HOW you attack agent and claim he has bad reading comprehension for grammatical errors. Usually agent goes over the top. I have said this before. You use that to disregard his concepts often, when you aren’t outright mocking his source.
bob,
1. Yes. I am fiscally Conservative and socially Liberal and that makes me an Independent. It’s not semantics, just simple understanding. In my opinion, a moderate is one who is a Democrat or Republican, but is not a Liberal or Conservative, and they will vote against their own party occasionally.
2. As I said in another post, he has brought how I and others treat him upon himself. He constantly insults me, falsely characterizes my beliefs, and refuses to accept the multiple olive branches I have extended. In addition, he refuses to answer questions directly. he may think he does, but he is usually just posting some irrelevant rant to detract form what I asked. When he or anyone else asks me a question, I post the question then provide my response.
Funny thing is, I agree with him more than I disagree. However, he will not even acknowledge that.
Bob, you may have noticed that Ron said he never claimed to be a Moderate. He was just a Progressive Socialist Independent who researched candidates before elections and then voted for the most Progressive Socialist President in the nation’s history – twice. We all know where he is coming from on every article.
Agent,
Just an Independent.
Please quantify how you came up with labeling President Obama the most Progressive Socialist President in the nation’s history. Please list all of the Socialist programs, based on the true definition of Socialism, that he has implemented since he became the President. Here are some, not all, that came before him: Department of Defense, Public Education, Public Libraries, Social Security, IRS, Medicaid and Medicare, EPA, and VA. These are actual Socialist, unlike the PPACA.
Moderate – Independent.
The wording here is what you’re playing at. Both you and confused do this often.
You know darn well you’re a self claimed no strings attached moderate, who would vote for either party.
Do you wish to recant this? Do you hang the liberal party line? You claim you don’t. This is why I call you a false moderate.
You attack the right, and claim you’re an independent.
Don’t argue semiotics. You know my concept is right.
Bob, I hope you now have ownership in your organization as you intimated last year. You will be a fine addition in helping your organization achieve it’s goals. This is a tough business to be in with what is going on in the market. We roll with the punches and are still here.
Did she say anything about wearing any?
Commando!!!
Speaking of Commando, that movie was Arnold in all his glory. He kicked some serious butt in that movie.
The claim came in just under the PD limit, I expect!
Comments start off kind of fun and interesting regarding a different kind of claim, and you guys manage to turn it into a personal and political bash session.
Here is a thought….sometimes it is not all about you and your personal agenda !
Agreed – it would be nice if we could keep the attacks to a minimum and just discuss the topic the article is about. I’m sure people didn’t come to the comment thread to read confused getting after Agent and bob getting after confused. I realize this post does not yet achieve the goal of keeping the comments on-topic with the article, but hopefully it’s not throwing gas on the already inflamed negative comments. That said…
“Several Portland attorneys said they have never had a client seek compensation for designer clothes”
But if her clothes were damaged due to the negligence of someone else, she’s entitled to reimbursement for the same! Unless the carrier denied her claim outright or applied, say, 50% betterment even though the items were just a year old, I don’t see why this is even an issue.
This is so cupcake fake I can’t believe it.
I did what was right in the scenario. Confused is the only person you need to mention, as well as Planet. You don’t get to ride the make yourself feel like a good person by saying people didn’t come here to see my go after someone, following agreeing with someone saying not everything is about your personal agenda.
That’s true, for Confused. As soon as confused takes a personal assault, people are not only vindicated by defending agent, they are SUPPOSED to defend agent. In school people like you watched the bullies fight, and allowed and enabled it by calling everyone the instigator, even the people defending themselves.
This is not a “everyone is messing up scenario”
This is a everyone needs to tell confused, “You screwed up buddy, you need to treat Agent better”
You have countless times directly and solely said this to Agent, and now that it’s someone attacking Agent you refuse to comment except insulting him as well. whenever someone attacks agent you include agent in who needs to be better. Vice versa with Ron etc you don’t.
The two comments below mandated a response to the people who tarnished Agent’s character and belittled him.
Also, it needed to be corrected in terms of non ethical points. Confused did not reference the correct event.
“confused says:
Like or Dislike:
Thumb up 2
Thumb down 4
so close agent. you ALMOST remembered something correctly. why let those pesky facts get in the way? who cares what really happened anyway, right?
A) That was a Virginia Tech student – it happened in Virginia and not Oregon
B) More importantly — Mindy Somers’ father did not take legal action! He wanted Tech officials to examine the safety issues and consider a memorial scholarship for his daughter, which they did.
“confused,
Agent never claimed to have a Donald Trump memory. You know, the greatest memory ever (self-proclaimed). Which begs a question to Donald’s statement about Muslims tailgating and celebrating 911, “I saw it on TV. I don’t remember where I saw it, but I saw it.” How does, “I don’t remember where I saw it” = greatest memory ever?”
Bob, thank you for the support, but I have been handling bullies for a long time. I remember in Jr High that there was a notorious bully always picking on someone smaller than him. I was also smaller than him and he started in on me one day. I told him, why don’t we settle this after school? We did and I kicked his butt all over the playground. It seemed that he really didn’t know how to fight. Guess what happened, after it was over, we shook hands and he also stopped his bullying on others. We actually were friends in High School. All he needed was a lesson and he got one.
Agent,
The only difference between that bully and you is that he was actually smart enough to learn his lesson.
The fact that you think anyone else on this blog is any more a bully that you or bob is laughable. If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.
Bob – I will not continue down the path of who said what to whom and who needs to be chastised or what-not. The sole point of my reply was to “…achieve the goal of keeping the comments on-topic with the article.” Since you didn’t comment on the article and just kept on with the personal attacks/discussion, I am not feeding into this conversation. Want to talk about the article? I’ll be happy to oblige and discuss that with you instead.
bob,
Agent has earned his treatment from others. He has no ability to civilly disagree with anyone or admit when he has been proven wrong.
Bob, I believe the leftists have labeled me a bully on this site for showing backbone against their attacks. As I recall, you have been labeled that many, many times starting way back in the Libby days and going forward. These leftist children really don’t want to hear the truth so they name call, scream when they can’t win an argument.
And, you don’t?
So, when you refuse to take it, you are showing a backbone, but if I don’t take it from you, bob or any other far right lunatic, I just won’t learn?
You are the biggest hypocrite on this site, period.
bob was labeled a bully because he is. How many times has he used demeaning, foul language in his posts to try and put others down? Where were you condemning him? Maybe you were too busy applauding him for “handing others their heads” when all he was really doing was trying to drown his opponents.
Rosenblatt, I have a new project for you. How about you compile some stats on how many times I make a comment about an article and how many times the attack dog trolls UW, Confused, Planet post their hate and vitriol no matter what the subject is. I can defend myself, but they are like immature children as Bob has pointed out on a number of occasions. Ron is terribly sarcastic, but generally not as hateful. Progressivism is a mental disease. They prove it every day.
I will not do that Agent. You have made it clear dozens of times that I’m not fit to be the IJ monitor. Keep your own tally.
My tally is 100% of the time. If you bothered to note it, you would see the same thing, time after time.
Hello Mike. I hope all is well with you. I am…frightened. Had I known your true persona (the one you demonstrate here) I would have never done business with you. You seem like such a nice man in person. Really, a nice man. Are these comments you publish really how you feel about your fellow man? I simply cannot believe you are so intolerant. I may not necessarily agree with the liberal agenda but that does not mean I slew hatred towards anyone who follows that path. You know, Mike, it took one search of your name to be linked to this little blog. I couldn’t believe it. I don’t know. This is seriously alarming. You have hid behind this “Agent” moniker for quite some time it seems. I’m going to do the people of our city a favor.
Planet, your lies will catch up with you sooner or later, hopefully sooner.
I don’t know what you mean by Planet but your response seems pretty typical when considering your behavior on this blog. Maybe, just maybe, your lies have finally caught up with you. Maybe, that smile you present yourself with in person has finally cracked. I liked you, Mike. I hope that these things I have read are all fabrications. I am utterly appalled by the hatred you spew.
Hey Truth, what a moniker name and couldn’t be farther from it. Planet is one of the ones who has been doing moniker theft for a couple of years now and he, along with Ins102 and others post all the time on several fake monikers and hacked my identity. Up until now, he is the only one I know of to use my name unless you picked up on it. How about revealing your real name so I can see who I am dealing with. My guess is that you are from NY and are a trouble maker like the rest of them are.
Agent,
Why are you so quick to accuse others without any evidence?
Sounds like Truth is a former client or business partner of yours and you just keep on insulting him/her.
Good job.
I am from Harrison. That is all you need to know. I am not here to play your games. I am not here to assume your identity or to try and make you look bad. Quite simply I feel disappointed in what I have discovered. Mike, please stop doing this. You are better than all of this. Well, I thought you were. And to Ron – just leave him alone. You seem like a respectful person and truth is in person he comes off as being one as well. Do not engage him anymore. He belittles you and you do not deserve he. No one does.
Thank you, Questioning!
Ron, he could save me the trouble by identifying himself. I have been careful not to write anyone with his belief system and I don’t have any former Partners since we have the original Partners and they all are as Conservative as I am.
Agent,
Why should he/she identify him/herself? You have not.
This is your problem. What exactly is Truth’s belief system and how do you know that it is a man? Please use Truth’s exact words from his/her posts to support your position.
I did not say he/she was a partner. I said, “Sounds like Truth is a former client or business partner” However, Truth did indicate a previous business relationship. I was covering both of the possibilities.
bob,
This is what I was talking about regarding Agent. Now do you see?
Ron, bob does not believe anything you have to say on any subject. We all know he has handed you your head on every subject before this forum. Truth is not a former client or partner and I have no idea where Harrison is. Is it Harrison NY, Harrison, Ark. By the way, everyone knows who I am after the ID theft was perpetrated by Ins102 and every one of the other moniker thieves jumped on the bandwagon.
Agent,
Did you voluntarily identify yourself or was someone else smart enough to figure you out?
bob is the one who stated, “I have allowed these false moderates like Ron to shake my opinion of you.” See how I use his exact words to prove that he, to some extant, did believe me?
If you do not know who Truth is, how can you possibly know that he/she is not a former client or business partner?
If you would stop making rash judgments about others based on unfounded assumptions, you might have some credibility. However, I get the sense that credibility is not that important to you.
Ok Truth, without identifying yourself to the forum, are you an Insurance Company man or with a Wholesale Brokerage? Give me the name of the company or brokerage and I will go through my contacts and figure out who you are and it will keep your identity secret from the rest of the posters. And I am disappointed that you are disappointed in my having a backbone against the 5 or 6 main antagonists who jump on me at the drop of a hat.
Agent,
You brought this upon yourself when you first incorrectly labelled me a Progressive, Socialist, Liberal Democrat and refused to apologize when I corrected you. Then, when I extended an olive branch multiple times, you decided to continue with your insults instead of accepting it and moving forward in a civil manner.
You are a misinformed, irrational, uneducated, thin-skinned bully, period.