Pa. Judge Rules Public Has Right to Know Details of Medical Malpractice Settlement

October 8, 2004

Bucking tradition, a Lackawanna County, Pa. judge has ruled against a doctor who sought to keep the details of a medical malpractice settlement under wraps, saying that taxpayers have a right to know because they are picking up part of the tab.

Common Pleas Judge Terrance R. Nealon last week refused to seal the case of an obstetrician-gynecologist sued for failing to diagnose a Lackawanna County woman who later died.

Lucille M. Korczakowski, 47, died of an ovarian cyst in 1999 that went undetected for at least three years. Her husband, James, sued her doctor, Jung Jang Hwan of Clarks Green, 15 miles north of Scranton.

The doctor’s insurance company, the Pennsylvania Medical Society Liability Insurance Co., offered to settle the case for $725,000 after court-ordered mediation. The judge was then asked to seal the terms of the settlement, as has been customary in medical malpractice cases for the last 20 years.

Nealon refused, saying that because 70 percent of the settlement in Korczakowski’s death is being paid from the MCare fund — the state-run insurance fund that covers catastrophic malpractice claims — the terms can’t be allowed to remain secret.

“Since the funds which will be used to pay the majority of the plaintiff’s settlement with Dr. Hwan are derived from public taxes or surcharges, any documents relating to disbursement of those settlement proceeds are clearly public records,” Nealon wrote.

Clifford Rieders, former head of the Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association, said that other judges around Pennsylvania will likely follow Nealon’s lead.

“He basically said: ‘You doctors wanted public money — the public’s right to know comes with that.’ I would say it is groundbreaking by that standard,’ Rieders said.

The Pennsylvania Medical Society, a lobbying group for doctors, declined comment.

___
Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Topics Legislation Pennsylvania

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • October 13, 2004 at 9:23 am
    steve says:
    I agree whole heartedly we as a public need to know of any medical professional that is found guilty of negligence, not just ones whose awards come from tax money. The idea sh... read more
  • October 8, 2004 at 2:18 am
    Debbie J. Marshall says:
    I agree wholeheartedly with Mr. Patrick. As one who lost a child as a result of medical malpractice, I can certainly emphathize with the plantiffs. As they say, Doctors bury... read more
  • October 8, 2004 at 9:45 am
    Timothy Patrick says:
    Although I do not see eye to eye with any trial lawyer on the issues of tort reform, the measure taken by this judge in Pennsyvania is the right thing to do. Too many medical ... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (3)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features