Malpractice Suit by Former Pats’ Coach Ends in Mistrial

February 22, 2007

A judge declared a mistrial Tuesday in Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis’ medical malpractice lawsuit after a juror collapsed and several doctors — including the two defendants — rushed to his aid.

The juror, an older man, began moaning as he listened to an expert testifying in defense of Massachusetts General Hospital surgeons Charles Ferguson and Richard Hodin.

Weis, who was on the coaching staff of the New England Patriots at the time, claims they botched his care after gastric bypass surgery in June 2002.

The judge immediately ordered the other jurors out of the courtroom, but some saw Ferguson, Hodin and other doctors who were in the courtroom rush to the collapsed juror’s aid.

An attorney for Weis said it was with “great reluctance” that he ask for the mistrial in the case that was expected to go to the jury Wednesday.

“I cannot think of an instance there would be more reason than when a juror has this kind of incident,” attorney Michael Mone said.

A lawyer for the doctors said a mistrial would be unfair to the surgeons, who had rearranged their schedules to accommodate Weis, who is in the offseason for football.

Judge Charles Spurlock, however, agreed to grant a mistrial.

“The integrity of the court is more important than schedules,” Spurlock said.

The juror collapsed while listening to the testimony of Dr. David Brooks, an expert who was saying the doctors acted responsibly in their treatment of Weis.

Spectators were ordered out of the courtroom shortly after the man fell ill. He was taken away in an ambulance; his condition and identity were not immediately known.

Weis accuses Ferguson and Hodin of acting negligently by failing to recognize life-threatening internal bleeding and infection after his surgery. The trial, which featured testimony from Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, was entering its second week.

Spurlock consulted with both sets of lawyers and spoke to the jurors after the man fell ill. One juror said he did not know if he could put the incident out of his mind in his deliberations.

“The fact that the doctors helped this juror and that the fact the other jurors saw them do that is something that would have to be in their minds,” Mone said outside the courtroom.

But William Dailey Jr., the lawyer for the doctors, said in court he wanted the trial to go on, saying a mistrial “would be terribly unfair to these doctors.”

“They responded the way they were trained to do,” he said. “They simply stood up and tried to help.”

Dailey said he thought the case was going well.

“We were confident and were very optimistic there was going to be a good result and that there would be no negligence found,” he said.

Mone said Weis wanted to move forward with the case, which could take months to reschedule.

“Mr. Weis is committed for this case to be tried to a conclusion,” the lawyer said.

Topics Lawsuits Medical Professional Liability

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.